edgarwiki

Fair value

1040 staff comments in this corpus, to 561 registrants, across 13 of the 15 calendar quarters this corpus covers.

Coverage is partial and not continuous. This corpus holds CORRESP filings from 2023Q1–2026Q3 (83–100% of each quarter's EDGAR total). It holds nothing filed after 2026-07-17. If an issue page shows no comment from one of those periods, the reason is that edgarwiki has no data for it — not that the staff raised nothing. Counts on this site are counts within this corpus and are not SEC-wide totals. Every quotation is verbatim and links to its filing; what is incomplete is coverage, not accuracy. Per-quarter figures: Methodology.
MeasureValue
Comments raising this issue1040
Share of all 92,899 comments in the corpus1.1%
Distinct registrants561
With a recorded company response1038

When these comments were filed

By the quarter the CORRESP filing was filed. The third column is how much of that quarter's EDGAR CORRESP output this corpus holds — read it before comparing two rows. A quarter marked never ingested contributes no comments to this page for reasons that have nothing to do with the SEC.

QuarterComments here Corpus coverage of that quarter
2023Q17193%
2023Q214891%
2023Q310793%
2023Q413496%
2024Q110393%
2024Q29283%
2024Q36490%
2024Q411196%
2025Q18192%
2025Q26289%
2025Q35590%
2025Q4993%
2026Q1385%
2026Q20100%
2026Q30100%

The exchanges

Verbatim, most recent first. Quotations are exact spans from the filing linked beneath each one; long passages are truncated with an ellipsis and never altered.

SEC staff comment
1. We note the disclosure in your financial statement footnotes that you performed a quantitative impairment analysis related to certain reporting units and a qualitative impairment analysis related to other reporting units and concluded no goodwill was impaired. Given the significance of your goodwill balance, please revise your Critical Accounting Estimates in future filings to clarify whether any of your reporting units are at risk of failing the goodwill impairment test. A reporting unit is at risk of failing the impairment test if it has a fair value that is not substantially in excess of carrying value. If no reporting units are at risk based on your most recent impairment test, please disclose such information to your readers as we believe it provides them with valuable information in assessing the sensitivity of your goodwill to future impairment. Alternatively, if a reporting…
The company responded
In future filings, to the extent applicable, we will include as part of our critical accounting estimate disclosures the fact that no reporting units are at risk of failing the impairment test as they have a fair value that is substantially in excess of carrying value. Our proposed revised wording for this critical accounting estimate is below (changes underlined for emphasis). Proposed wording in future Form 10-K filings: Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets Our Management annually reviews goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If we determine that the carrying value of the goodwill and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable, we record a permanent impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value of the goodwill and other long-lived assets exceeds it fair…
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC · filed 2026-03-03 · 0001104659-26-022637
SEC staff comment
Comment: With respect to Short Term Investment Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, Inc., we note that in response to a comment given during the most recent SOX review the registrant stated the fund will clarify in future reports that the amortized cost method was used only with respect to securities that have a maturity of 60 days or less. The staff does not believe this clarification has been made in the Notes to Financial Statements. Going forward, please include a description of the valuation techniques used and the fair value measurement of those assets measured at amortized cost in compliance with ASBY 820-10-50-2-bbb(1). 3
The company responded
The omission of disclosure indicating that valuations using the amortized cost method were used only with respect to securities that have a maturity of 60 days or less was in error. STIF’s valuation techniques and the fair value measurement of those assets measured at amortized cost in compliance with ASBY 820-10-50-2-bbb(1) will be disclosed in reports going forward. 11.
US Mortgage-Backed & Income Fund for Puerto Rico Residents, · filed 2026-02-27 · 0001193125-26-082773
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you recorded material goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges in prior periods. We also note that the assessment of goodwill for impairment is identified by your auditor as a critical audit matter in their audit report. Based on the continued materiality of goodwill and intangible assets to your financial statements, underlying negative operating trends, and the fact that your net book value exceeds your market capitalization, please more fully explain to us how you determined the estimated fair values of your reporting units exceed their carrying values. In addition, to the extent you conclude an impairment charge that could materially impact your financial statements is reasonable possible, expand your disclosures to address the following: • Disclose whether you performed an impairment test since your most recent annual impairment test and explain why or why…
The company responded
As described in Critical Accounting Policies in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Company has identified Global Ceramic, Flooring North America (“Flooring NA”) and Flooring Rest of the World (“Flooring ROW”) as its reporting units for the purposes of allocating goodwill as well as assessing impairments. As of the Company’s 2024 annual goodwill impairment testing date, which was the first day of the fourth quarter of 2024 (the “2024 Annual Impairment Test Date”), the Company completed quantitative goodwill impairment tests (the “Annual Impairment Tests”) and determined that the estimated fair values of its reporting units with goodwill exceeded their carrying values and that the Company did not have any at-risk reporting units. Additionally, on an interim basis the Company assesses if a triggering event has occurred that might reduce the fair value…
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC · filed 2026-01-13 · 0001104659-26-003385
SEC staff comment
1. We note that the Fund invests in Secondaries. Please supplementarily describe whether the Fund intends to use the net asset value (“NAV”) of Secondary Investments as a practical expedient in accordance with ASC 820 when determining the fair value of secondary investments. If so, please discuss how often the Adviser will receive information related to such investments’ NAVs and describe the type of information the Adviser expects to receive (e.g., capital statement or annual report). Where NAV as a practical expedient is not utilized, please explain how the Fund will calibrate to observable market data, including any private secondary information. Securities and Exchange Commission December 31, 2025
The company responded
The Fund respectfully submits that the following disclosure in the section of the prospectus entitled “Calculation of Net Asset Value” sufficiently describes the Fund’s fair valuation policy with respect to Secondary Investments and other Private Market Assets. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund will add the disclosure indicated below to explicitly state that the Fund will use the NAV of a Private Markets Asset as a practical expedient: The Valuation Policy Procedures provide s that the Fund will value its investments in Private Market Assets at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures . Under ASC Topic 820, the Fund uses a practical expedient to value certain Private Market Assets by using the net asset value of the Fund’s ownership in the investment subject to adjustments in certain circumstances. More specifically, t T he fair value…
StepStone Private Markets · filed 2025-12-31 · 0001193125-25-338316
SEC staff comment
Comment 10 : Please include the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820-10-50-2(g) regarding disclosures related to sensitivity to uncertainty of fair value measurements when describing Level 3 securities in the Notes of the Financial Statements.
The company responded
The Registrant undertakes to include these disclosures in future filings.
Grandeur Peak Global Trust · filed 2025-12-09 · 0001580642-25-007743
SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share in prior comment 4: • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and • Confirm that you will present the income tax effect separately from other non-GAAP adjustments as it does not appear that you have done so in your September 30, 2025 earnings release. Company
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; We confirm that we have provided prior year comparative information related to adjusted diluted net loss per share for our most recently filed earnings release for the period ended September 30, 2025, furnished with the Commission on October 27, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ Q3 2025 Earnings Release ”), and will continue to do so in future filings. • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and We respectfully…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-12-08 · 0001130713-25-000082
SEC staff comment
4. In the Schedule of Investments, the Staff notes various positions where fair value equals par. Please supplementally explain how this is in line with the Fund’s valuation policy and procedures.
The company responded
The Fund employs a robust process to estimate the fair value of its investments at the end of each financial quarter. Please refer to the following excerpt from Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates: Fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters when such quotations are readily available. In accordance with Rule 2a -5 under the 1940 Act, a market quotation is “readily available” only when it is a quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical instruments that a fund can access at the measurement date, provided that such a quotation is not considered to be readily available if it is not reliable. The Company utilizes mid -market pricing (i.e., mid -point of average bid and ask prices) to value these investments. These market…
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund · filed 2025-12-04 · 0001213900-25-118274
SEC staff comment
5. The Staff notes the inclusion of “Option pricing model” and “Expected volatility” under the columns labeled “Valuation Technique” and “Unobservable Input”, respectively, in the tables on page 193 under “Note 5. Fair Value Measurements”. The Staff further notes that the narrative description below such tables does not reference these items. The Staff notes that the narrative description of the uncertainty of the fair value measurement that would result from using unobservable inputs shall include the unobservable inputs disclosed when complying with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” paragraph 820 -10-50-2 and its subsection (bbb) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Please revise accordingly.
The company responded
The Fund hereby confirms that it will make the requested change in future filings.
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund · filed 2025-12-04 · 0001213900-25-118274
SEC staff comment
Comment : The Staff notes that in complying with the requirements regarding quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement for Level 3 securities, the Registrant should provide the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop the Level 3 fair value measurements and should disclose how it calculated the weighted average. Please discuss in correspondence why this information regarding the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs was not included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Please see ASC-820-10-50-2(bbb)(1)-(2)(i).
The company responded
The Registrant did not include a range or weighted average of significant unobservable inputs in the Annual Report because each row in the relevant table for which an input was provided pertains to a single investment using that particular unobservable input. As such, no range or weighted average was relevant to the fair value measurements disclosed. The Registrant will seek to clarify the presentation of this table in future filings. - 3 - October 23, 2025 5.
Blackstone Alternative Investment Funds · filed 2025-10-23 · 0001193125-25-248912
SEC staff comment
6. Please confirm supplementally that the unfunded commitments are fair valued, in line with ASC 820, and please include these disclosures in future financial statements. Company’s
The company responded
The Company confirms that its unfunded commitments are fair valued in accordance with ASC 820, consistent with the disclosures in footnote 9 to the Schedule of Investments and will include additional disclosure in the discussion of fair value measurements in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in future filings with the Commission. Ms. Lauren Hamilton - 4 -
Oaktree Strategic Credit Fund · filed 2025-10-21 · 0001193125-25-245459
SEC staff comment
3. We note your response to prior comment 8 that the subscribed share obligations are equity-linked instruments classified in equity, with no gain or loss recognized in earnings. We also note your response to prior comment 9 that the future purchase of bitcoin under the PIPE Bitcoin Sale and Additional PIPE Bitcoin Sale agreements would be accounted for as derivative instruments under ASC 815 with changes in fair value of the derivative, rather than of the underlying bitcoin, recognized through the statement of operations. Please tell us your consideration of reflecting the transactions described in your response within your Pro Forma Statements of Operations. Your adjustments CC to the pro forma statement of operations for the period ended June 30, 2025, and adjustments EE and JJ to the pro forma statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 appear to reflect the receipt…
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comments, the Company has removed the Bitcoin fair value adjustments on the Pro Forma Statement of Operations for the period ended June 30, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024 and added an adjustment to the Pro Forma Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 for the gain on the settlement of the derivative liabilities reflected in Adjustments (G), (O), and (P) on the Pro Forma Balance Sheet. * * * Please contact Lorenzo Corte at +44 20 7519-7000 or via email at lorenzo.corte@skadden.com should you require further information. Sincerely, /s/ Jack Mallers Jack Mallers Chief Executive Officer Twenty One Capital, Inc. cc: Steven Meehan Chief Financial Officer Twenty One Capital, Inc. Lorenzo Corte and Maria Protopapa Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP 2
Twenty One Capital, Inc. · filed 2025-10-17 · 0001213900-25-099976
SEC staff comment
5. Please more fully address the following items. ● You state idle assets are accounted for in accordance with IAS 16. Tell us, and revise future filings to clarify, if idle assets are being depreciated and, if not, explain to us how you considered the guidance in paragraph 55 of IAS 16. ● You state you engaged an appraiser to determine the fair value of Republic Steel’s assets for the purposes of assessing potential impairment under IAS 36 and that no impairment was identified in 2024. Based the lack of cash flows related to the assets, tell us, and revise future filings to clarify, how estimated fair value was determined, including the amount or percentage by which estimated fair value exceeds carrying value. ● You state “As of December 31, 2024, a portion of Republic Steel’s inventory consisted of steel products that, if sold at current market prices, would generate a loss;…
The company responded
Idle assets are being depreciated in accordance with paragraph 55 of IAS 16, the Company continues to depreciate these idle assets because management has not yet determined that they are to be permanently withdrawn from use. Accordingly, the assets are depreciated over their remaining useful lives despite being inactive. The Company intends to maintain this accounting treatment in future filings unless management’s plans regarding these assets change. The table below presents a comparative summary of the carrying values and appraised fair values of the Company’s property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2023 and 2024. All figures are in thousands of U.S. dollars and are based on values determined by an independent appraiser: Year Carrying Value Fair Value; Land & Buildings Fair Value; Machinery & Equipment Total Fair Value Excess Fair Value % Excess over Carrying Value 2023 $…
GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V. · filed 2025-10-01 · 0001213900-25-094936
SEC staff comment
1. We note you recorded a bargain purchase gain of $102.5M for the three months ended March 31, 2025 upon acquisition of United Development Funding IV (“UDF IV”). Please tell us in greater detail the reassessment performed under ASC 805-30-25-4 before recognizing the gain. In addition, please expand your disclosures to highlight the facts and circumstances that resulted in your acquisition of UDF IV at a significant discount relative to the fair value of net assets acquired consistent with the guidance in ASC 805-30-50-1(f)(2).
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and acknowledges that ASC 805-30-25-4 requires that if a bargain purchase gain is identified, the acquirer should reassess whether all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been identified and recognized, including any additional assets and liabilities not previously identified or recognized in the acquisition accounting. In accordance with ASC 805-30-25-4, the Company followed the guidance outlined in ASC 805-20-25-5 and ASC 805-30-25-6 in completing its review of the business combination. Specifically, the Company completed the following items: • To verify that all identifiable assets and liabilities assumed were properly accounted for in the business combination, the Company reviewed the historical financial statements of UDF IV, reconciled the business combination workpapers to the ending balance sheet of UDF…
Ready Capital Corp · filed 2025-09-29 · 0001628280-25-043143
SEC staff comment
38 – Intangible Assets and measured initially at cost. The non cash transaction was completed at a share price of €5.30 per share (par value being €0.01), with shares being distributed to all shareholders of the UK company on a pari pasu basis to their percentage shareholding in the UK company at the time of transfer. There are no future payment obligations related to the intellectual property rights. General meetings of the shareholders of both the seller and buyer took place, and resolutions were passed by both parties, fully approving the terms of the sale and purchase agreement. This transaction was considered a related party transaction as Jack Kaye, CEO of Davion, was a director and shareholder of both the seller and buyer, but declared his interest prior to the transaction and excluded himself from voting either as a director or shareholder in respect of both buyer and seller.…
The company responded
The initial fair value was agreed between the parties to the purchase agreement at Euro 5.30 per share. See disclosure above, shares were exchanged based on the sale price agreed upon between the parties. • Also tell us and disclose how you determined the initial fair value of the acquired intellectual property rights. If determined by the fair value of your equity shares, provide us an analysis as to how such fair value of your equity shares compares to your other share issuance price, preferably to a third party at similar time if any; if determined by any valuation model, disclose the model and key assumptions used.
DAVION HEALTHCARE PLC · filed 2025-09-26 · 0001683168-25-007262
SEC staff comment
7. We have read your response to prior comment 8. We understand that the IFRS 2 charge for listing services should be calculated by taking the fair value of the shares to be issued and then subtracting the amount of adjusted net assets acquired. However in your case, the adjusted net assets are negative which means that the amount should be added as an additional listing cost since you are assuming net liabilities instead of receiving net assets. For example, it appears that the IFRS 2 charge assuming no redemptions should be the sum of $63,162,380 and $7,824,036 which equals $70,986,416. Please revise your calculations under all three scenarios and only include this adjustment in your annual pro forma statement of operation.
The company responded
The disclosure on pages 126-128 of Amendment No. 1 has been revised in accordance with the Staff’s comment. Dilution to Relativity's Stockholders, page 131
Relativity Holdings Inc. · filed 2025-09-25 · 0001104659-25-093479
SEC staff comment
10. With respect to the use of UPFs, please describe when determining fair value of investments in private royalty funds whether the registrant intends to use the net asset value of the underlying fund as a practical expedient in accordance with ASC-820. If so, discuss how often the Fund valuation designee will receive information relating to the underlying royalty fund’s NAV for purposes of valuation and describe the type of information the valuation designee expects to receive. If the Fund is not using NAV as a practical expedient, additionally describe how the Fund will calibrate to publicly observable market equivalence data.
The company responded
With respect to investments in UPFs, the Fund confirms that it intends to use the NAV of the UPFs as a practical expedient in accordance with ASC-820. The Fund’s valuation designee expects to receive information at least quarterly, but processed on an ongoing basis, relating to the UPFs for valuation purposes. The valuation designee expects to receive reports from the underlying general partners, including without limitation quarterly and annual statements with audited financials, where applicable, and perform valuation adjustments based on additional fund-specific and general market factors (such as interest rates) as appropriate.
Lincoln Partners Group Royalty Fund · filed 2025-09-22 · 0001193125-25-211950
SEC staff comment
Comment: Please disclose the reasons for the transfers into or out of level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the period. See ASC 820-10-50-2(c)(3).
The company responded
The Registrant confirms that it will make the requested changes in future financial statements. 4.
FlowStone Opportunity Fund · filed 2025-09-19 · 0001104659-25-091686
SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share: • Revise your description on page 8 of the adjusted diluted net loss per share calculation to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value. • Tell us why you only present this measure for the most recent period, while you presumably utilize this measure for a period-to-period comparison. • Tell us and disclose in greater detail the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors. • In your Item 2.02 Form 8-K for the period ended December 31, 2023, it appears you previously had adjusted for write-downs of assets held for sale. Tell us why you do not adjust for…
The company responded
• Revise your description on page 8 of the adjusted diluted net loss per share calculation to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value. We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In future filings, to the extent applicable, we will revise the description to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value as it relates to adjusted diluted net loss per share. • Tell us why you only present this measure for the most recent period, while you presumably utilize this measure for a period-to-period comparison. We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In our earnings release for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, furnished with the Commission on February 24, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ 2024 Earnings Release ”), we presented a non-GAAP measure of adjusted diluted net loss per…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-09-18 · 0001130713-25-000066
SEC staff comment
10. We acknowledge your revised disclosure in response to prior comment 46. Please tell us why purchases of Bitcoin for cash are initially recorded at fair value instead of acquisition price plus transaction costs consistent with the guidance in ASC 350-30- 30-1 and ASC 805-50-30-1. Otherwise, revise your disclosure to differentiate between the initial measurement for digital assets purchased for cash and those received in exchange for other assets or equity contributions.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page F-31 of the Registration Statement. *************** 3 We thank the Staff for its review of the foregoing. If you have further comments, please feel free to contact our counsel, Katherine E. Geddes, Esq. of Reed Smith LLP at kgeddes@reedsmith.com or by telephone at (469) 680-4249. Sincerely, /s/ Anthony Pompliano Anthony Pompliano Chief Executive Officer cc: Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP Columbus Circle Capital Corp I 4
ProCap Financial, Inc. · filed 2025-09-18 · 0001213900-25-089081
SEC staff comment
Comment : Confirm that an amendment will include a disclosure regarding the applicability of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”).
The company responded
Comment acknowledged and the Company confirms that the amended Registration Statement includes disclosure regarding the applicability of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”) under the heading “Item 9. Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters – Valuation of Portfolio Securities”. 30. Staff
TCW Steel City Perpetual Levered Fund LP · filed 2025-09-18 · 0001193125-25-207564
SEC staff comment
19. The fundamental investment restriction regarding industry concentration on page 4 of the SAI says: “Each Fund, other than the Participation Fund, shall not concentrate its investments in any particular industry, and no investment shall be made if such investment at the time made would cause more than 25% of the total assets of the Fund, taken at market value or fair value as determined by the Trustees, to be invested in securities of issuers in any one industry. This restriction does not apply to the Participation Fund.” Please include a fundamental policy if the Participation Fund will be concentrated – please identify the industry or group of industries which the Fund will concentrate its investments.
The company responded
The Participation Fund’s policy with respect to concentration is disclosed in the prospectus. The Registrant will add this disclosure to the SAI.
AMANA MUTUAL FUNDS TRUST · filed 2025-09-15 · 0000898432-25-000723
SEC staff comment
8. In adjustments A, N, O and R, you present the exchange of equity interests for bitcoin under the April PIPE, Contribution, June Pipe and Additional PIPE agreements at the agreed-upon valuations. Please explain to us why you believe it is appropriate to measure the bitcoin at the contractual valuation and to recognize the difference in fair value from that contractual valuation through your pro forma earnings, citing the specific accounting literature you relied upon. In your response, tell us how you considered whether this is a transaction in your own capital stock under ASC Topic 505-10-25-2.a. or a transaction between entities under common control under ASC Topic 805-50-30-5, neither of which would result in a recorded gain or loss.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. We considered the guidance in ASC 505-10 and 815-40 when evaluating whether the exchange of equity interests for bitcoin under the April PIPE, Contribution, June Pipe and Additional PIPE agreements should be presented at agreed-upon valuations or contractual value. ASC 505-10-25-2(a) applies to transactions involving the issuance of an entity’s outstanding equity shares in exchange for consideration. However, because the subscribed shares were not issued and outstanding at inception, but rather represent obligations indexed to the Company’s own equity, the instruments fall within the scope of ASC 815-40. Under ASC 815-10-15-74(a) and ASC 815-40-25, the contracts qualify for the equity classification scope exception and are classified in stockholders’ equity. Accordingly, the transactions do not result in the recognition of a gain or loss…
Twenty One Capital, Inc. · filed 2025-09-12 · 0001213900-25-087360
SEC staff comment
8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net, page F-31 We note that you performed a quantitative goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2024, which indicated that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. We also note that the decline in Search Advertising revenues starting from the second quarter of 2024 through the second quarter of 2025 has been material. Considering the significant and sustained decline in Search Advertising revenues, please provide information for investors to assess the probability of future goodwill impairment charges. For example, please disclose whether the reporting unit is at risk of failing step one of the quantitative impairment test or that the fair value of your reporting unit is substantially in excess of carrying value and is not at risk of failing step one. If the fair value of your reporting unit is not substantially in…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company advises the Staff that it performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment for the Search Advertising reporting unit in the fourth quarter of 2024, and the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 22.3%, which the Company believes to be substantially in excess of its carrying value. As such, the Company does not believe its Search Advertising reporting unit is at risk of failing step 1 of the quantitative impairment test. In future 20-F filings, the Company will include disclosure as to whether the reporting unit is at risk of failing step 1. Based on the above factors, the Company believes Search Advertising’s fair value is substantially in excess of its carrying value. In the future, however, if the Company believes that the reporting unit is at risk of a goodwill impairment charge, it…
Perion Network Ltd. · filed 2025-09-11 · 0001178913-25-003297
SEC staff comment
5. Your revised disclosures in response to prior comment 9 indicate that management evaluated macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, and various entity specific events to determine that an impairment indicator was not present and an additional quantitative impairment test was not required. Please provide us with your qualitative assessment so that we may better understand how you determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount including goodwill.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In response, and in light of both the Staff’s observations and events occurring in the updated reporting period, the Company performed a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis in addition to its prior qualitative assessment. The results of this quantitative evaluation, together with the related disclosures, have been included in the Amended Registration Statement. Please see pages 244-245 of the Amended Registration Statement for the revised disclosure. SharonAI Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, page F-88
Roth CH Holdings, Inc. · filed 2025-09-10 · 0001829126-25-007295
SEC staff comment
26. It appears from Note 2 that you are accounting for the transaction with Rorschach as an asset acquisition and recording the assets acquired at fair value. We note from page F-51 that on July 2, 2025, Rorschach acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock in Hyperliquid Strategies Inc for no consideration. Please tell us how you considered whether the transaction was a reorganization of entities under common control.
The company responded
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 135-143 of the Registration Statement in response to the Staff’s comment. The Company has concluded that the Rorschach Merger and related transactions are a reorganization of entities under common control and that the Closing PIPE proceeds will be recorded based on the fair value of consideration received in the form of cash and HYPE tokens. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance September 4, 2025 Page 6 Note 3. Historical Adjusted Financial Information, page 141
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc · filed 2025-09-04 · 0001641172-25-026581
SEC staff comment
59. Please tell us and revise future filings to clarify the following items. ● Explain your current intentions regarding Republic Steel and its remaining assets. ● Explain how you are accounting for Republic Steel’s assets since you ceased operations. Refer to IFRS 5 and IAS 16. ● In the third paragraph on page 59, you quantify assets related to the Lorain, Ohio facility for the years 2022, 2021 and 2020. Quantify amounts related to the current periods presented. ● In the fourth paragraph on page 59, we note you “performed an analysis of the fair value of the four facilities (Canton, Solon, Massillon and Lackawanna) and determined net book value exceeded fair value by approximately U.S. $130.7 million (Ps. 2,701 million) and as such recognized an asset impairment of this amount during the year ended December 31, 2015”. This disclosure appears to relate to the Lorain facility impairment…
The company responded
The Company takes note of the Staff’s comment and provides the following explanations, which will also be reflected in expanded disclosures in future Form 20-F filings. Current intentions regarding Republic Steel. At present, management has determined that the Republic Steel facilities will remain inactive unless there are changes in prevailing economic conditions that justify resuming operations. Accounting treatment of Republic Steel assets. As of December 31, 2024, because management does not intend to sell the facilities, IFRS 5 (Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations) does not apply. Instead, the assets continue to be accounted for in accordance with IAS 16 (Property, Plant and Equipment), measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment, as appropriate. In addition, the Company engaged an authorized appraiser to determine the fair value of the…
GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V. · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001213900-25-084141
SEC staff comment
7. Once you have an estimated offering price or range, please explain to us how you determined the fair value of the common stock underlying your equity issuances and the reasons for any differences between the recent valuations of your common stock leading up to the IPO and the estimated offering price. This information will help facilitate our review of your accounting for equity issuances including stock compensation.
The company responded
Preliminary Price Range The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company currently expects a price range of approximately $[***] to $[***] per share (the “ Preliminary Price Range ”) for the planned initial public offering (“ IPO ”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “ Common Stock ”), which Preliminary Price Range does not reflect the impact of a reverse stock split of the Common Stock that the Company anticipates may be effected prior to the filing of, and reflected in, an amendment to the Registration Statement to be filed prior to the commencement of the Company’s road show (the “ Reverse Stock Split ”). The share and per share numbers in this letter are presented on a pre-Reverse Stock Split basis. This Preliminary Price Range implies a pre-money equity valuation for the Company of $[***] million to $[***] million. The Preliminary Price Range…
LB PHARMACEUTICALS INC · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001193125-25-195145
SEC staff comment
4. We note your response to prior comment 2. Please tell us whether you recognize in future periods any of the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative associated with future projected renewals that is excluded in the current period adjusted operating income. 3 In other words, please clarify if the initial adjustment is subsequently “amortized” back into adjusted operating income.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and confirm that the initial adjustment is not subsequently amortized back into AOI in any future renewal period(s). General
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001193125-25-194921
SEC staff comment
3. Please disclose the grant date fair value of the CEO Service Awards and the CEO Stock Price Awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2025. Clarify the fair value per share of the underlying equity interest used in determining the fair value of these awards. To the extent there is a material difference between this fair value and the midpoint of your offering range, fully explain the assumptions used and the reason for the difference.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that the grant of the CEO Service Award and CEO Stock Price Award is contingent on the effectiveness of the Registration Statement. The grant date for the CEO Service Award and CEO Stock Price Award will be the date of the effectiveness of the Registration Statement, and the grant date fair value of the CEO Service Award and the CEO Stock Price Award will be determined based on the final offering price for the Company’s initial public offering (“ IPO Price ”). The grant date fair value of the CEO Service Award will be equal to the IPO Price multiplied by the number of restricted stock units issued (362,108). The grant date fair value of the CEO Stock Price Award will be determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model that incorporates the likelihood of meeting the stock price targets and for which the inputs…
Via Transportation, Inc. · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001603015-25-000013
SEC staff comment
5. To the extent the compensation cost associated with the awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2025 will have a material impact on your financial statements, tell us how you considered disclosing the assumptions and valuation methodologies used in determining the fair value of these awards.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that it has revised the disclosure on page F-55 of the Amendment to disclose the assumptions and valuation methodologies that are expected to be used in determining the fair value of the awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2025 and contingent on the IPO, and to note that these awards could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. General
Via Transportation, Inc. · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001603015-25-000013
SEC staff comment
14. We note your response to prior comment 19 and your revised disclosure on pages 155, 161, 173 and 174. Please address the following: • Your response appears to indicate that the non-GAAP adjustments for “ Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets and Related Investments” on pages 173 and 174 include changes in fair value of the digital assets you hold directly and changes in fair value of your investment in the Domestic Solana Fund, which primarily holds Solana tokens. Enhance your disclosure on pages 173 and 174 to more fully describe and define this adjustment, so that the filing disclosures are clear and quantify the components included in this amount. • Revise your disclosures where appropriate to ensure that an investor is able to reconcile the “Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets Held and Related Investments” amounts as disclosed on pages 173-174 to the related amounts in your…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 176 and 177 to enhance clarity and ensure that investors are able to reconcile the “Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets and Related Investments” amounts to the corresponding amounts disclosed in the footnotes. September 2, 2025 Page 8 The Company further advises the Staff that, with respect to the Domestic Solana Fund, the Company acknowledges that investors are not able to directly reconcile such amounts for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 with the revised disclosures to Note A of the combined consolidated financial statements on page 177, as the Company did not present a summary of changes in its equity investments for those periods. Beginning with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025, however, the Company has included a summary of changes in its equity investments…
FT Intermediate, Inc. · filed 2025-09-02 · 0001628280-25-041444
SEC staff comment
Comment : Under “Types of Investments and Related Risks - Liquidity and Valuation,” there is disclosure that states "The Advisor fair values the Fund's Alternative Funds based on valuations provided by the Underlying Managers of the Alternative Funds, which valuations may also be based on fair valuation procedures. Further, the fair values of Alternative Funds are subject to adjustment or revisions if the Fund's NAV is adjusted after a Shareholder has received their Shares upon purchase or received repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer. The adjustment will not, in most cases, result in an adjustment to the number of Shares received by the Shareholder in a purchase, or a Shareholder's repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer." Please add this disclosure to the following sections: Types of Investments and Related Risks – Valuation” and “Types of Investments and Related Risks…
The company responded
The Fund has added the requested disclosure in the Revised Registration Statement. We trust that the foregoing is responsive to your comments. Questions and comments concerning the enclosed materials may be directed to the undersigned at (215) 988-3328 or, in my absence, to Joshua M. Lindauer at (212) 248-3298. Sincerely, /s/ Joshua B. Deringer Joshua B. Deringer cc: Michael Kosoff, Senior Special Counsel Joshua M. Lindauer, Partner, Faegre Drinker
Calamos Aksia Hedged Strategies Fund · filed 2025-08-27 · 0001104659-25-083985
SEC staff comment
2. The Staff refers to footnotes (f) and (g) to the Company’s Consolidated Schedule of Investments appearing on page F-16 of the Form 10-K. In future filings, in accordance with Rule 12-14 of Regulation S-X, please include the fair value at the beginning of the period and the fair value at the end of the period with respect to each investment and present the total for each category.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will reflect the Staff’s comment in future filings. Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP is part of a global legal practice, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities, under Eversheds Sutherland. For a full description of the structure and a list of offices, please visit www.eversheds-sutherland.com.
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. · filed 2025-08-27 · 0001213900-25-081129
SEC staff comment
1. You have identified developed technology and goodwill from the Tantti acquisition totaling $76 million. On page 14, you refer to patent assets acquired as part of this acquisition and your policy footnote on page 83 refers to the estimated fair value of customer relationships, developed technologies, trademark/tradename, patents, noncompete agreements and in-process research and development from your acquisitions. 1 Given the significance of the allocation to goodwill and developed technology, please tell us why you have not identified or assigned value to patents or other intangible assets from this acquisition. Refer to ASC 805-20-55. As part of your response, please include a general description of the procedures you follow to identify intangible assets in your business acquisitions.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that as disclosed in the Form 10-K, the Company’s growth strategy includes making targeted acquisitions of businesses that have innovative technologies and products. While conducting due diligence on the target’s business and following completion of a business acquisition, the Company conducts a thorough review of both financial and operating information of the acquiree, including but not limited to historical financial statements, product and customer sales data, significant executory contracts, financial and tax diligence reports, tax returns, marketing materials, and website information. This information is supplemented through discussions with key members of management of the acquiree. This information is then analyzed by Company management including members of the finance, legal, and operations departments as well as executive leadership,…
REPLIGEN CORP · filed 2025-08-26 · 0001193125-25-188971
SEC staff comment
32. The Staff is concerned that a general understanding of an expense allocation methodology, which may appear reasonable, may not provide the Board with a complete picture of the fees paid or the benefits/services received by each fund. For instance, ProFunds VP UltraShort Dow 30 and ProFunds Short Dow 30 accrued audit fees of $2 and $5 respectively, for fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to ProFunds VP UltraNasdaq-100 and ProFunds VP Nasdaq-100 which accrued $222,483 and $151,486, respectively. In your response, please address the concern highlighted in this example, that certain funds may be cross subsidizing the services of other funds. In another example, Government Money Market ProFund was allocated audit and tax fees both from its sole investment in the master portfolio which is audited by Ernst & Young, and for the audit of the Fund, which is conducted by PwC. Based…
The company responded
Audit and tax fees are accrued in accordance with the terms of the audit and tax engagement letter with the independent public accounting firms (PwC for the VP Funds and KPMG for the Retail Funds). The Trust negotiates the audit and tax fees based on the fund complex (VP Funds or Retail Funds) and the services the fund complex requires. The Audit Committee of the Board reviews audit and tax fees during the selection process on an annual basis and during the organization of new funds. Minimum cost information on a per-fund basis is not provided to the Trust. As the Trust’s funds are designed for active trading and for tactical asset allocation strategies that involve frequent and often large purchases and redemptions of shares of the funds in each complex, the AUM for an individual fund may vary significantly over the course of an audit period. It is difficult, if not impossible, to…
ProFunds · filed 2025-08-22 · 0001039803-25-000007
SEC staff comment
19. We note the following disclosures quantifying the change in fair value of digital assets: • "Other expense, net" disclosure on pages 149 and 156, which states that the change in fair value of digital assets was $(10,509), $0, $13,603 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. August 18, 2025 Page 8 • Non-GAAP disclosure on pages 167 and 168, which includes adjustments indicating that the change in fair value of digital assets was $(9,962), $0, $10,674 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. • Investments footnote disclosure on pages F-25 and F-75, which states that the change in fair value of digital assets held as collateral and held for sale was $(20,442), $0, $7,910 and $215 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 155 and 161 to align with the financial statements. The Company further advises the Staff that Non-GAAP disclosures on pages 172 and 173 to include the changes in fair value of the digital assets it holds directly as well as its ratable investment in the Domestic Solana Fund which primarily holds Solana tokens. Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page F-57
FT Intermediate, Inc. · filed 2025-08-18 · 0001628280-25-040674
SEC staff comment
7. It appears from your response to prior comment 1 that additional Legacy Kodiak Options were granted after the most recent balance sheet date of March 31, 2025. Please revise to include a discussion of such grants and the associated compensation expense, if material. Refer to ASC 855-10-50-2. In your response, tell us how the pending Business Combination Agreement factored into your valuation of the underlying common stock used in determining the fair value of the options granted since March 31, 2025 and provide us with the underlying share fair value and exercise price used in your Black-Scholes calculations for such grants.
The company responded
We advise the Staff that Legacy Kodiak Options granted from April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025 have been included in Legacy Kodiak’s condensed financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and are reflected in the stock option activity table on F-99. Legacy Kodiak has also summarized the options it granted after June 30, 2025 in the subsequent events footnote on F-102. Legacy Kodiak has utilized valuation reports prepared by a third-party firm in assessing the fair value of its common stock when granting options. Since March 31, 2025, such valuation reports used a probability-weighted expected return model with the following two scenarios: (i) Legacy Kodiak consummates a business combination 3 transaction with a special purposes acquisition company (e.g., the Business Combination) and (ii) Legacy Kodiak continues to operate as a private company. Legacy Kodiak’s…
Kodiak Robotics, Inc. · filed 2025-08-15 · 0001193125-25-181964
SEC staff comment
7. We note that you believe the Business Combination is not within the scope of ASC 805 because neither Domestication Sub or Roth meet the definition of a business in accordance with ASC 805. We further note from adjustments 2(g) and 3(a) that you are accounting for the Business Combination in accordance with ASC 718 with an expense reflected for the difference between the fair value of the SharonAI Ordinary Shares issued to Roth shareholders as compared to the fair value of Roth’s net liabilities. Tell us why you believe the transactions should be accounted for in accordance with ASC 718 with compensation expense recognized for the service of a stock exchange listing. Clarify why fair value of SharonAI shares issued in exchange for Roth shares is included in these adjustments. Please cite the authoritative literature that supports your presentation. Describe your consideration of…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and have revised the disclosures accordingly, see pages 197, 200, 203 and 204 of the Amended Registration Statement. 3 Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations, page 178
Roth CH Holdings, Inc. · filed 2025-08-12 · 0001829126-25-006121
SEC staff comment
9. Please tell us whether you performed interim and annual impairment tests for goodwill and intangible assets and if so, revise your disclosures to include critical accounting policies that discuss the results of the impairment analyses. Also, given the materiality of your goodwill balance and to provide investors with useful and meaningful information necessary to understand how you determined whether an impairment charge is necessary as well as the probability of future goodwill impairment, please revise to provide the following disclosures: ● the date that you perform your annual goodwill impairment test each year; ● a discussion of how goodwill and intangible assets are tested, including whether you performed a qualitative and/or quantitative test; ● the specific factors and critical assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit(s) and the degree of uncertainty…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and have revised the disclosures accordingly, see pages 223 of the Amended Registration Statement. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Finite- lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment under ASC 360-10 if events suggest their carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company did not identify any impairment indicators and thus did not perform an impairment analysis on the intangible assets. The Company performs its goodwill impairment assessment in accordance with the guidance in ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, using both qualitative and quantitative factors. In accordance with the standard,…
Roth CH Holdings, Inc. · filed 2025-08-12 · 0001829126-25-006121
SEC staff comment
10. Please provide an itemized chronological schedule covering all SharonAI equity instruments issued since the beginning of fiscal 2024 through the date of your response. Please provide the following information separately for each equity issuance: ● the date of the transaction; ● the identity of the recipient, indicating if the recipient was a related party; ● nature and terms of the transactions; ● the number of shares issued; ● per share amount paid; ● management’s fair market value per share estimate and how the estimate was made and; ● an explanation of how the fair value of the preferred stock and common stock relate. Please reconcile each share issuance in your response to your Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and cross reference such amounts to the disclosures throughout your filing.
The company responded
Please see attached file “SAI Share Transaction History Workbook” for complete details of all equity transactions in SharonAI since inception. 5 All equity transactions described herein have been valued based on management’s good faith estimate of the Company’s overall valuation at the time of issuance. This estimation has been informed by various qualitative and quantitative factors, including the Company’s operational progress, financial performance, market conditions, industry progress, and the terms upon which third-party investors have been willing to invest capital. In particular, management has considered the implied valuation from recent arms-length financings and expressions of investor interest as indicative of fair value for equity instruments issued in such transactions. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4. Acquisitions, page F-95
Roth CH Holdings, Inc. · filed 2025-08-12 · 0001829126-25-006121
SEC staff comment
3. Please restore the accounting policy disclosures for property, plant, and equipment; fair value; and convertible notes that were included in your prior amendment.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has restored the accounting policy for property, plant, and equipment; fair value; and convertible notes that were included in our prior amendment. Green Rain Energy Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) respectfully requests that the above-referenced Offering Statement on Form 1-A be declared qualified by the Securities and Exchange Commission, effective at 3:00PM Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, or as soon thereafter as is practicable. Please be advised that the State of Colorado is prepared to qualify or register the offering, more particularly we are in receipt of the written communication from the Department of Regulatory Agencies Division of Securities of the State of Colorado, that the offering is “Effective or Cleared for Sale” in the State of Colorado. The effective date is March 25, 2025 and the File# is 2025-23-754. We thank…
Green Rain Energy Holdings Inc. · filed 2025-08-08 · 0001683168-25-005778
SEC staff comment
1. We note your response to prior comment 2, including that you granted stock under the amended purchase agreement on December 6, 2024 and the purchase price was “negotiated on an arms-length basis and represents what the parties believed was the value at such time”; however, we also note the following: ● The relatively short time period between when the stock was granted and when the draft registration statement was submitted; ● The more than ten-fold increase in the implied enterprise value of the company indicated by each transaction during the short time period; ● The modest improvement in current interim results relative to comparable interim results; and ● Mr. John’s role as CEO. It remains unclear to us how you determined the purchase price to be paid Mr. John represents the fair value of the shares he will acquire and that the stock sale agreement is not essentially…
The company responded
As there has been no public market for our common stock to date, the implied enterprise value of the Company, as of any date, has been determined by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) with input from the management team (the “Management”). To better assist the Staff on how Board and Management determined the implied enterprise value of the Company as of December 6, 2026, the date of the amended purchase agreement, we have provided the analysis from a third-party valuation company below. The third-party valuation company procedures, investigations, and financial analyses included, but were not limited to the following: ● The Company’s historical financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023, through December 31, 2024, and the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2025 ● Pro forma financial models provided by Management ● Information regarding recent developments…
OFF THE HOOK YS INC. · filed 2025-08-08 · 0001493152-25-011760
SEC staff comment
3. Please confirm in correspondence that the Company’s unfunded commitments are fair valued in accordance with ASC 820.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company evaluated the fair value of the Company’s unfunded commitments as of December 31, 2024, and determined that the unfunded commitments were not material. The Company respectfully confirms that there is no impact on the Company’s liquidity to cover the unfunded commitments. The Company undertakes to fair value the unfunded commitments in accordance with ASC 820 in the future. 1 Ken Ellington, Staff Accountant August 8, 2025 Page 2
Stellus Private Credit BDC · filed 2025-08-08 · 0001104659-25-075609
SEC staff comment
1. We note your use of Adjusted EBITDA, which represents EBITDA adjusted for changes in the fair value of inventory, share-based payment expense, impairment losses (and gains) on financial assets, and other expenses (or income). Please quantify the components of the adjustment for “other expenses, net” and explain your consideration of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K in excluding these amounts from your Non-IFRS measure. In this regard, based on your reconciliation on page 74, “other expenses, net” appears to represent the most significant adjustment in arriving at Adjusted EBITDA.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, we respectfully advise that we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors evaluates our results. As defined in our filings, Adjusted EBITDA means net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for changes in the fair value of inventory, share-based payment expense, impairment losses (and gains) on financial assets, and other expenses (or income). We believe the adjustments reflect non-recurring or non-cash items that our management, board of directors and others believe are appropriate to provide an additional measure of our underlying earnings performance. The components of the adjustment for “Other expenses, net” are as follows, which we believe reflects appropriate…
Intercure Ltd. · filed 2025-08-07 · 0001641172-25-022533
SEC staff comment
3. Please explain how your Unrealized changes to fair value adjustments of biological assets of NIS 6.5 million and Loss from fair value changes realized in the current year of NIS 11.8 million were calculated. Please also explain how these amounts correlate to the NIS 1.6 million change in fair value less selling costs as disclosed on page F-29.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, we respectfully advise that the calculation of changes in the fair value of biological assets includes two components: (i) Unrealized fair value changes (gains/losses) – representing the impact of changes in fair value for medical cannabis plants, prior to their harvesting, which are defined as biological assets and had not been sold as of the balance sheet date. (ii) Realized fair value changes (gains/losses) – representing the impact of changes in fair value for medical cannabis plants which have been harvested, transferred to Inventory and sold during the reporting period. The calculation of each component for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”), which is consistently applied for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, is as follows: (i) Unrealized fair value changes (gains/losses): the…
Intercure Ltd. · filed 2025-08-07 · 0001641172-25-022533
SEC staff comment
3. Please confirm in correspondence that the Company’s unfunded commitments are fair valued in accordance with ASC 820.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company evaluated the fair value of the Company’s unfunded commitments as of December 31, 2024, and determined that the unfunded commitments were not material. The Company undertakes to fair value the unfunded commitments in accordance with ASC 820 in the future. Christopher R. Bellacicco, Senior Counsel Ken Ellington, Staff Accountant August 4, 2025 Page 3
Stellus Capital Investment Corp · filed 2025-08-04 · 0001104659-25-073695
SEC staff comment
15 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in the financial statements was included to describe the requirements under ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280) and the benefit to the reader of such disclosure. The Registrant confirm s that subsequent financial statements will include disclosures that meet these criteria. August 1, 2025 Page 4 Comment #10 Please confirm whether the unfunded commitments listed in note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are fair valued and whether the Fund recorded unrealized gain or loss on the unfunded commitment. Going forward please include these disclosures in the financial statements. See Jan. 2006 AICPA Expert Panel Minutes.
The company responded
The Registrant confirms that the commitments listed in note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements were fair valued and it recorded unrealized gain/loss on the commitment. As noted in the response to Comment #1 above, the Registrant notes that the commitment is funded. The Registrant confirms that, going forward, it include these disclosures in the financial statements. Comment #11 In future financial statements, please disclose and discuss with more specificity the reasons for the transfers into and out of Level
Monachil Credit Income Fund · filed 2025-08-01 · 0001104659-25-072967
SEC staff comment
10. We note your disclosure that the NAV of the Trust will be determined based on the MarketVector Solana Benchmark Rate but that, for financial statement purposes, the Trust’s SOL will be carried at fair value as determined based on the price provided by the SOL market that the Trust considers its “principal market.” Please expand to clarify whether the disparity between these valuation methods could be material and disclose how such disparity will be disclosed to investors.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Trust has revised the disclosure on pages 13 and 116 of the prospectus to clarify whether the disparity between valuation methods could be material and to disclose how such disparity will be disclosed to investors. Risk Factors, page 15
VanEck Solana ETF · filed 2025-07-31 · 0001628280-25-036986
SEC staff comment
2. We note your revised disclosure on page 21 that the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately following this offering excludes shares of common stock issued to "the U.S. Unicorn Foundation, Inc. ('Unicorn Foundation') for services and that will vest and expense contemporaneously with the closing of this offering, with a fair value of 0.80 per share and shares of common stock, the equivalent of 3%of the Company equity, to be issued should Unicorn Foundation complete a following-on financing within 12 months of the closing of this offer." We also note your disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements describing your agreement with U.S. Unicorn. Please revise your summary to discuss the material terms of your advisory agreement with the U.S. Unicorn Foundation, and revise your risk factors to discuss any risks related to this agreement, including any potential…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that it has revised pages 17 and 50 of Amendment No. 6 to address the Staff’s comment. Use of Proceeds, page 55
Picard Medical, Inc. · filed 2025-07-30 · 0001829126-25-005569
SEC staff comment
7. We see that you have disclosure on page 31 explaining that payments required under the tax receivable agreement with former shareholders of Omni may be substantial and understand that in the event of early termination, you would be required to make a payment equal to the present value of anticipated future payments. You indicate payments will generally equate to 83.5% of tax benefits realized as a result of (i) increases in the tax basis of the acquired assets resulting from certain actual or deemed distributions and the future exchange of units, (ii) certain pre-existing tax attributes, (iii) tax benefits realized from certain tax allocations, and (iv) other tax benefits attributable to payments made under the tax receivable agreement. Please expand your disclosure on page F-24 to clarify whether the $13,270,000 that you have quantified for the associated liability in your purchase…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment regarding its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”). The Company advises the Staff that the $13,270,000 set forth as “ Liabilities under tax receivable agreement ” in the Omni purchase price allocation on page F-24 of the Form 10-K represents the net present value (“NPV”) of the payments that the Company estimated would be required to be made to fulfill all TRA payment obligations with respect to equity issuances to Omni holders at and as of the date of the Omni Acquisition. In the Income Taxes footnote to the consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K, the Company also disclosed its estimated liability under the TRA, as of the balance sheet date, based on exchanges (the “additional tax benefits”) that occurred in 2024 after the closing of the Omni Acquisition. As further disclosed in such…
FORWARD AIR CORP · filed 2025-07-28 · 0001628280-25-036245
SEC staff comment
1. As previously requested, please also address how you determined that the gain should be considered a debt discount and amortized over the expected term of the notes. Note that ASC 470-50-40-13 states that if extinguishment accounting is applied, the new debt instrument shall be initially recorded at fair value. ASC 470-50-40-2 also specifically states that gains and losses from extinguished debt shall not be amortized to future periods.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully advises the Staff that the Company recognized an extinguishment gain within equity pursuant with ASC 470-50-40-2, which states: A difference between the reacquisition price of debt and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt shall be recognized currently in income of the period of extinguishment as losses or gains and identified as a separate item. Gains and losses shall not be amortized to future periods. If upon extinguishment of debt the parties also exchange unstated (or stated) rights or privileges, the portion of the consideration exchanged allocable to such unstated (or stated) rights or privileges shall be given appropriate accounting recognition. Moreover, extinguishment transactions between related entities may be in essence capital transactions. The Company recognized an extinguishment gain for the excess…
Alps Global Holding Pubco · filed 2025-07-25 · 0001641172-25-020934
SEC staff comment
1. We have read your response to prior comment one. We note you plan to disclose the range of calculated fair values over book values for your indefinite-lived intangible assets and identify and disclose brands you consider at higher risk of impairment. For brands you consider to be at higher risk of impairment, please confirm you will also disclose and discuss the key assumptions used to estimate their fair values and the potential events or circumstances that could reasonable be expected to negatively those key assumptions.
The company responded
We confirm that in future filings for brands that we consider to be at higher risk of impairment, we will also disclose and discuss the key assumptions used to estimate their fair values and the potential events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively impact those key assumptions. Quality Foods Since 1889 Securities and Exchange Commission July 23, 2025 Page 2
B&G Foods, Inc. · filed 2025-07-23 · 0001104659-25-070085
SEC staff comment
10. Please provide a summary of share-based awards granted since January 1, 2024. Provide the date and amount of each share-based award granted along with estimated fair value of the underlying shares of common stock. Reconcile and explain the differences between the fair values determined on each grant date including the difference between the most recent grant date fair value and the midpoint of your offering range. This reconciliation should describe significant intervening events within the company and changes in assumptions with the valuation methodologies employed that explain the changes in fair value of your common stock up to the filing of the registration statement.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has provided the requested summary and reconciliation below. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company believes that the fair values used as the basis for determining share-based compensation in connection with its profit interest and restricted share unit grants have been reasonable and appropriate for the reasons set forth below. 5 Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission July 22, 2025 Page 6 Equity Awards From January 1, 2024 to July 22, 2025 Since January 1, 2024, the Board of Directors, with input from management, determined the estimated fair value of the Company’s share-based awards after considering contemporaneously obtained valuation reports from an independent third-party valuation specialist as well as the other objective and subjective factors described in the Registration Statement…
NIQ Global Intelligence plc · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001193125-25-162270
SEC staff comment
Comment : Please revise “Valuation Risk” to clearly and plainly disclose the following: a. The Adviser fair values the Fund’s investment in Private Funds based on valuations provided by the Managers of such Private Funds, which valuations may also be based on fair valuation procedures. These fair value determinations may prove to be inaccurate. b. The fair value of Private Funds is subject to adjustment or revisions. If the Fund’s NAV is adjusted after a shareholder receives their shares upon purchase or receives repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer, the adjustment will not, in most cases, result in an adjustment to the number of shares received by the shareholder in a purchase or a shareholder’s repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer; therefore, shares may be purchased or repurchased at a NAV that may later turn out to be incorrect.
The company responded
The Fund will revise “Valuation Risk” as marked below. The Fund believes that stating that the Fund’s shares may be purchased or repurchased at a NAV that may later turn out to be incorrect would be confusing to shareholders. For any fund that holds an investment that is fair valued, the fund’s NAV is a good faith estimate based on the information available on the date such NAV is determined; this is not unique to the Fund or its investment in Private Funds. - 4 - July 22, 2025 • Valuation Risk. The value of the Fund’s investments will be difficult to ascertain, and the valuations provided in respect of the Private Funds, private debt investments and other private securities will likely vary from the amounts the Fund would receive upon withdrawal, realization or other disposition of these investments. While the value of the Fund’s publicly-traded securities is more readily…
Versus Capital Infrastructure Income Fund · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001133228-25-007358
SEC staff comment
Comment : In the subsection “Fair Valuation Methodology” in the section “Calculation of Net Asset Value,” please add disclosure, if accurate, that states that the Adviser fair values the Fund’s investments in Private Funds based on valuations provided by the Managers of the Private Funds, which valuations may also be based on fair value valuation. One or both of these fair value determinations may prove to be inaccurate. Also add that incorrect valuations of Private Funds could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s net asset value and shareholder transactions in the Shares and include a cross-reference to the risk disclosure. - 6 - July 22, 2025
The company responded
Please see the response to Comment 8 above. 10.
Versus Capital Infrastructure Income Fund · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001133228-25-007358
SEC staff comment
Comment : Please revise “Valuation Risk” to clearly and plainly disclose the following: a. The Adviser fair values the Fund’s investment in Private Funds based on valuations provided by the Managers of such Private Funds, which valuations may also be based on fair valuation procedures. These fair value determinations may prove to be inaccurate. b. The fair value of Private Funds is subject to adjustment or revisions. If the Fund’s NAV is adjusted after a shareholder receives their shares upon purchase or receives repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer, the adjustment will not, in most cases, result in an adjustment to the number of shares received by the shareholder in a purchase or a shareholder’s repurchase proceeds in a repurchase offer; therefore, shares may be purchased or repurchased at a NAV that may later turn out to be incorrect.
The company responded
The Fund will revise “Valuation Risk” as marked below. The Fund believes that stating that the Fund’s shares may be purchased or repurchased at a NAV that may later turn out to be incorrect would be confusing to shareholders. For any fund that holds an investment that is fair valued, the fund’s NAV is a good faith estimate based on the information available on the date such NAV is determined; this is not unique to the Fund or its investment in Private Funds. - 4 - July 22, 2025 · Valuation Risk. The value of the Fund’s investments will be difficult to ascertain, and the valuations provided in respect of the Private Funds, the Sub-REIT, private debt investments and other private securities will likely vary from the amounts the Fund would receive upon withdrawal, realization or other disposition of these investments. While the value of the Fund’s publicly-traded securities is more readily…
Versus Capital Real Assets Fund LLC · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001133228-25-007361
SEC staff comment
Comment : In the subsection “Fair Valuation Methodology” in the section “Calculation of Net Asset Value,” please add disclosure, if accurate, that states that the Adviser fair values the Fund’s investments in Private Funds based on valuations provided by the Managers of the Private Funds, which valuations - 6 - July 22, 2025 may also be based on fair value valuation. One or both of these fair value determinations may prove to be inaccurate. Also add that incorrect valuations of Private Funds could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s net asset value and shareholder transactions in the Shares and include a cross-reference to the risk disclosure.
The company responded
Please see the response to Comment 8 above. * * * * * If you have any questions or require any clarification concerning the foregoing, please call me at 617-951-7780. Sincerely, /s/ Lisa M. Henry Lisa M. Henry cc: Sarah Clinton, Ropes & Gray LLP Chelsea M. Childs, Ropes & Gray LLP Brian Petersen, Versus Capital Advisors LLC Jillian Varner, Versus Capital Advisors LLC
Versus Capital Real Assets Fund LLC · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001133228-25-007361
SEC staff comment
2. In light of the total shareholders’ deficit balances of your other subsidiaries, VIEs and VIEs’ subsidiaries, it is unclear why Yimutian Inc. is reporting a long-term investments balance of RMB 507,962. Please clarify and advise us. Also, revise the description of the long-term investments line-item to more clearly describe its nature. In this regard, identifying your interest in the VIEs as an investment may be confusing since you do not own the equity of the VIEs. The Staff’s comment is duly noted. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that deficits in other subsidiaries and in VIEs and VIEs’ subsidiaries do not directly reduce the accounting carrying amount of the holding company’s specific profitable or fairly valued investment asset unless there is concrete evidence linking those deficits to an impairment of that specific asset. The Company further submits to the Staff…
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on the page F-34 of the Registration Statement. Regarding the key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted in 2024, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that, as it did not grant new stock options in 2024, it maintained the assumptions established in the 2023 assessment. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission July 22, 2025 Page 5 As of December 31, 2023 As of December 31, 2024 Before Adjustment Balance with Other Group Entities Elimination of Intercompany Amounts After Adjustment Before Adjustment Balance with Other Group Entities Elimination of Intercompany Amounts After Adjustment (in thousands) ASSETS Current assets Cash 496 — — 496 129 — — 129 Restricted cash — — — — — — — — Accounts receivable, net — — — — — — — — Amounts due from related parties 3,386 — — 3,386 3,436 — — 3,436…
Yimutian Inc. · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001213900-25-066616
SEC staff comment
6. Please revise to disclose the key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of exchangeable notes as of December 31, 2024.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on the page F-37 of the Registration Statement. Regarding the key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of exchangeable notes as of December 31, 2024, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that, as it did not engage in equity financing or bond issuance in 2024, it maintained the assumptions established in the 2023 assessment. The Company has conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the fair value measurement at the end of 2024 in accordance with ASC 820 and SEC requirements. To identify external factors that may affect fair value measurement, such as changes in market condition, the Company has taken the following steps: ● Macroeconomic analysis: Review indicators such as interest rates, inflation, industry growth rates, and geopolitical risks in 2024, and compare them with benchmark data in 2023. ●…
Yimutian Inc. · filed 2025-07-22 · 0001213900-25-066616
SEC staff comment
7. We note your response to prior comment 5; however, we are unable to agree with your conclusion. Please revise your unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations to remove the adjustment for the change in fair value of intangible assets.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and have revised our unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements beginning on page F-2 accordingly. On behalf of the Company, thank you for your review of this letter. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact Callie Jones of Brunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC by telephone at (801) 303-5721 or by email at callie@bcjlaw.com or Anne Peetz of Reed Smith LLP by telephone at (713) 469-3853 or by email at apeetz@reedsmith.com. Very truly yours, /s/ Tim Pickett Chief Executive Officer Kindly MD, Inc. cc: Callie Tempest Jones, Brunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC Lynwood Reinhardt, Reed Smith LLP Anne Peetz, Reed Smith LLP Katherine Geddes, Reed Smith LLP 3
Kindly MD, Inc. · filed 2025-07-18 · 0001213900-25-065340

Showing the 60 most recent of 1040.