Fair value
610 staff comments in this corpus, to 326 registrants, across 7 of the 7 calendar quarters this corpus covers.
Coverage is partial and not continuous. This corpus holds CORRESP filings from 2023Q1–2024Q2 (82–96% of each quarter's EDGAR total); 2025Q4 (16% of the 861 CORRESP filings EDGAR indexed that quarter). It holds nothing at all from 2024Q3, 2024Q4, 2025Q1, 2025Q2 or 2025Q3, and nothing filed after 2025-12-31. If an issue page shows no comment from one of those periods, the reason is that edgarwiki has no data for it — not that the staff raised nothing. Counts on this site are counts within this corpus and are not SEC-wide totals. Every quotation is verbatim and links to its filing; what is incomplete is coverage, not accuracy. Per-quarter figures: Methodology.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Comments raising this issue | 610 |
| Share of all 51,900 comments in the corpus | 1.2% |
| Distinct registrants | 326 |
| With a recorded company response | 608 |
When these comments were filed
| Quarter | Comments here | Corpus coverage of that quarter |
|---|---|---|
| 2023Q1 | 59 | 93% |
| 2023Q2 | 140 | 91% |
| 2023Q3 | 101 | 93% |
| 2023Q4 | 121 | 96% |
| 2024Q1 | 97 | 93% |
| 2024Q2 | 88 | 82% |
| 2024Q3 | — | 0% — never ingested |
| 2024Q4 | — | 0% — never ingested |
| 2025Q1 | — | 0% — never ingested |
| 2025Q2 | — | 0% — never ingested |
| 2025Q3 | — | 0% — never ingested |
| 2025Q4 | 4 | 16% |
The exchanges
SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share in prior comment 4: • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and • Confirm that you will present the income tax effect separately from other non-GAAP adjustments as it does not appear that you have done so in your September 30, 2025 earnings release. Company
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; We confirm that we have provided prior year comparative information related to adjusted diluted net loss per share for our most recently filed earnings release for the period ended September 30, 2025, furnished with the Commission on October 27, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ Q3 2025 Earnings Release ”), and will continue to do so in future filings. • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and We respectfully…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-12-08 · 0001130713-25-000082
SEC staff comment
4. In the Schedule of Investments, the Staff notes various positions where fair value equals par. Please supplementally explain how this is in line with the Fund’s valuation policy and procedures.
The company responded
The Fund employs a robust process to estimate the fair value of its investments at the end of each financial quarter. Please refer to the following excerpt from Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates: Fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters when such quotations are readily available. In accordance with Rule 2a -5 under the 1940 Act, a market quotation is “readily available” only when it is a quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical instruments that a fund can access at the measurement date, provided that such a quotation is not considered to be readily available if it is not reliable. The Company utilizes mid -market pricing (i.e., mid -point of average bid and ask prices) to value these investments. These market…
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund · filed 2025-12-04 · 0001213900-25-118274
SEC staff comment
5. Fair Value Measurements”. The Staff further notes that the narrative description below such tables does not reference these items. The Staff notes that the narrative description of the uncertainty of the fair value measurement that would result from using unobservable inputs shall include the unobservable inputs disclosed when complying with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” paragraph 820 -10-50-2 and its subsection (bbb) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Please revise accordingly.
The company responded
The Fund hereby confirms that it will make the requested change in future filings. 6. Disclosure in “Note
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund · filed 2025-12-04 · 0001213900-25-118274
SEC staff comment
Comment : The Staff notes that in complying with the requirements regarding quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement for Level 3 securities, the Registrant should provide the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop the Level 3 fair value measurements and should disclose how it calculated the weighted average. Please discuss in correspondence why this information regarding the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs was not included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Please see ASC-820-10-50-2(bbb)(1)-(2)(i).
The company responded
The Registrant did not include a range or weighted average of significant unobservable inputs in the Annual Report because each row in the relevant table for which an input was provided pertains to a single investment using that particular unobservable input. As such, no range or weighted average was relevant to the fair value measurements disclosed. The Registrant will seek to clarify the presentation of this table in future filings. - 3 - October 23, 2025 5.
Blackstone Alternative Investment Funds · filed 2025-10-23 · 0001193125-25-248912
SEC staff comment
Comment: In the Notes to the Financial Statements, please revise Note 3(e) on page F-10 to state that fair value measurements and disclosures are recognized in the Schedule of Investments as opposed to the Statement of Operations.
The company responded
The Registrant notes that the relevant disclosure is intended to state that the change from mark-to-market with daily pricing is recorded in the Statement of Operations as unrealized gain/loss on investments, which the Registrant believes is appropriate and consistent with US GAAP standards (in particular, ASC 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies). Further, Note 4 to the Financial Statements states that investments are recorded at fair value in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities in accordance with ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurement. As such, the Registrant respectfully declines to make the requested change. 2 10.
Pearl Diver Credit Company, LLC · filed 2024-06-28 · 0001214659-24-011579
SEC staff comment
9. We note from your response to prior comment 20 that no accounting impact has been given to the Earnout Share provision, which you note will be classified within equity under ASC 815. To this end, you state that “As a result of equity classification, the fair value of the shares transferred will be recorded within equity upon the date the shares are granted to the holder (i.e., the date in which the occurrence of Triggering Events I and/or II are met, if they are met.” Please explain to us why you believe that the Earnout Share provision should not initially be measured at fair value. Please provide a more detailed analysis in support of your position, including reference to specific paragraphs you relied upon in ASC 815.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and sets for the below its detailed analysis in support of its position that equity treatment for the Earnout Shares, if an when issued, is appropriate. The following U.S. GAAP requirements were considered in accounting for the Earnout Shares: 1. ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”); 2. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (“ASC 815”); 3. ASC 805, Business Combinations, (“ASC 805”); and The Earnout Share provisions include a future contingency related to the post-closing entity’s EBITDA threshold, for Triggering Event I and the average of the reported sales prices of one share of Roth common stock, for Trigging Event II. No explicit or implied service conditions are included as part of the agreement terms. There are no employee services or board of director services being provided in exchange for the Earnout Shares;…
Roth CH V Holdings, Inc. · filed 2024-06-28 · 0001104659-24-076333
SEC staff comment
14. We note your response to prior comment 25. However, disclosure on page 27 states that “Pursuant to the Advisor Agreement, in exchange for the termination of the BCMA, Acquiror and the Company mutually agree, jointly and severally, on the date of closing of the Business Combination, to issue to the Advisors an aggregate of 575,000 shares of Acquiror Common Stock and to include such shares as a “registrable security” in the Registration Rights Agreement.” Based on this disclosure, it appears the 575,000 shares in Adjustment H should be given pro forma effect at current fair value. Please advise or revise as necessary.
The company responded
On page 89 of the Prospectus, the Company has adjusted the fair value of the shares issued to the advisors to the price per share of ROCL common stock as of June 6, 2024.
Roth CH V Holdings, Inc. · filed 2024-06-28 · 0001104659-24-076333
SEC staff comment
4. We note from your response to our prior comment 2 that your Non-Cash Acquisition Amortization and Depreciation adjustment in both 2023 and 2022, includes an amount related to the depreciation of the purchase accounting adjustment to step-up acquired PP&E to its fair value. It appears to us that this results in presenting a non-GAAP measure that substitutes individually tailored recognition and measurement methods given that it adjusts for partial depreciation expense. Please revise your non-GAAP measures to remove this adjustment in future filings. Refer to Question 100.04 of the SEC Staff’s Non- GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance June 26, 2024 Page 3 of 3
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and advise the Staff that, in future filings, the Company will not make an adjustment to its GAAP results related to the depreciation of the step-up in acquired PP&E to its fair value. Please contact the undersigned at (760) 930-5891 or Heather McAllister, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (760) 804-4368 if you have any further questions or require any further information. Very truly yours, /s/ Jennifer Thomas Jennifer Thomas Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. · filed 2024-06-26 · 0001193125-24-168829
SEC staff comment
4. Considering goodwill and intangible assets represent the vast majority of your total assets, ensure that you include a critical accounting policy addressing how you assess such assets for impairment. Your disclosures should include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: ● Provide a thorough discussion of your impairment testing policies, including a description of the key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the reporting units for your goodwill impairment analysis, how the key assumptions were determined, the degree of uncertainty associated with the key assumptions, and any material changes in the key assumptions during the periods presented. ● Discuss how goodwill and other intangible assets were tested during 2023, including whether you performed a qualitative and/or quantitative test. ● Indicate how you determine your reporting units for goodwill impairment…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that the Company has revised pages 211-212 of the Amended Registration Statement. AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. – Audited Financial Statements 2. Business Combinations, page F-52
AIRO Group, Inc. · filed 2024-06-25 · 0001493152-24-025181
SEC staff comment
51. Footnote 3 – Fair Value Measurements, page 17. The Company discloses the following: “The investments in an SPV that have yet to purchase the underlying securities are held at cost and are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.” Please discuss in correspondence how this statement conforms with US GAAP. Include in the discussion references to appropriate US GAAP related to valuation and rights and obligations of the Company.
The company responded
The Company notes that the SPVs it invests in are formed for the sole purposes of pooling capital in order to purchase securities of a single private issuer. The fair value of SPV investments where the SPV has not yet purchased the underlying security is estimated using the cost basis of the transaction, which is the value of the cash used to fund the investment. Since there is generally not a significant period of time between investing in an SPV and the SPV investing in the underlying security, the Company believes that this is the most appropriate measure of fair value.
Destiny Tech100 Inc. · filed 2024-06-24 · 0001575872-24-000695
SEC staff comment
52. Footnote 3 – Fair value Measurements, page 17 / Footnote 5a, page 21. The following disclosure is noted for the management fees from the SPVs associated with the Company: "If an SPV charges management fees, those fees will adjust the cost of the SPV." Please discuss in correspondence how this treatment conforms with the Investment Company Act. Also, footnote 5(a), page 21, includes a reference to SPV management fees. Also, please confirm in correspondence whether these management fees were applied as cost adjustments to the SPV vehicles, as indicated on page 17. Karen Rossotto, Senior Counsel June 24, 2024 Page 19
The company responded
As disclosed in Note 5(a) to the notes to the Fund’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, the Fund paid $0 in management fees in connection with its investments in SPVs. Therefore, no cost adjustments were made to the investments in SPVs. The Company evaluated and followed the guidance set forth in ASC 946-320-30-1 and ASC 820-10-35-9B in connection with the treatment of these fees. Please also see the Company’s response to comment No. 24.
Destiny Tech100 Inc. · filed 2024-06-24 · 0001575872-24-000695
SEC staff comment
4. In regard to non-recurring fair value measurements, please revise future filings to quantify and disclose the estimated fair values/carrying values of the impaired assets.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. In future filings, the Company will provide the fair values and carrying values of any impaired assets in the fair value footnote rather than cross-referencing to other footnotes such as “Goodwill and Related Intangible Assets” and “Exit Activity Costs and Asset Impairments”. (20) Segment Information, page 63
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. · filed 2024-06-24 · 0000912562-24-000038
SEC staff comment
1. We continue to believe it would be beneficial to investors to provide a more fulsome discussion of how you determined that the carrying value of the Atlantic City Center is recoverable, despite the fact that the carrying value exceeds fair value. Please also explain to us why the carrying value of $111.1 million disclosed on page 60 does not agree to the $88.4 million carrying value calculated from Schedule III. Company
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises as follows: 1. (a) In accordance with ASC 360, we determined that the carrying value of the Atlantic City Center ($111.1 million at December 31, 2023) is recoverable because the sum of the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from operations and the estimated potential disposition of the Center (in aggregate totaling $151.5 million at December 31, 2023) exceeds the carrying value by $39.6 million, or 36%. Based on the assumptions and discussion described below, we estimated future undiscounted cash flows over the holding period of $64.5 million and disposition value of approximately $87.0 million, or $151.5 million in aggregate. As part of our evaluation process, and consistent with ASC 360, management estimates future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the Center.…
TANGER PROPERTIES LTD PARTNERSHIP /NC/ · filed 2024-06-21 · 0000899715-24-000111
SEC staff comment
5. We acknowledge your analysis that the stock price and change of control provisions are exercise contingencies that do not preclude the Sponsor Earnout from being considered indexed to the entity’s own stock (Step 1). However, given the Sponsor Earnout Shares can only result in the issuance of zero shares or a fixed number of shares, it is unclear how you concluded that the settlement amount would not equal the difference between the fair value of a fixed number of the entity’s equity shares (1,350,000) and a fixed strike price ($12.50) in the Step 2 test outlined in ASC 815-40-15-7C. Accordingly, it appears that this arrangement should be accounted for as an equity instrument instead of as a liability. Please refer to ASC 815-40-55-27, and advise, or revise your presentation accordingly.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 78 and 79 of Amendment No. 4 in response to the Staff’s comment to treat the Sponsor Earnout Shares as an equity adjustment in adjustment (i) on the pro forma balance sheet. The arrangement is not a liability under ASC paragraph 480-10-25-8 because (a) it does not embody an obligation to repurchase the issuer’s shares (nor is it indexed to the obligation) and (b) it would not require the issuer to settle the obligation by transferring assets. Additionally, the arrangement is not a liability under ASC paragraph 480-10-25-14 because it does not embody an obligation that ExcelFin may settle by issuing a variable number of its shares (it embodies an obligation that ExcelFin may be required to settle by delivering a fixed number of its shares). 5.
Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd · filed 2024-06-20 · 0001104659-24-073476
SEC staff comment
23. You determined the fair value for the exclusive sublicense for the patented rights relating to the manufacture of Graphene using a Section 409A valuation of the company’s stock as of August 30, 2022. Regarding the valuation method and its application, please tell us how you complied with the disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10-50-2(bbb) as it pertains to nonrecurring fair value measurements.
The company responded
We acknowledge the staff’s comment and have revised our registration statement accordingly.
Novusterra Inc · filed 2024-06-20 · 0001654954-24-007988
SEC staff comment
1. Staff’s comment : Based on your disclosure related to compensation actions taken in 2024, please address the following: • Revise MD&A to quantify and disclose the expected impact of these actions on future results of operations. In this regard, we note disclosures on page 100 appear to address the expected impact of certain historical actions, but it does not appear MD&A addresses the expected impact of the additional actions taken in 2024; Austin Bay Area Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Miami Munich Paris Riyadh Salt Lake City Shanghai Washington, D.C. Page 2 • Explain any differences between the anticipated IPO stock price range and the fair value estimates you used for the restricted stock units and stock options granted in 2024; and • Tell us what consideration was given to disclosing these actions as subsequent events in the notes to…
The company responded
The Company evaluated the grant of RSUs to David J. Lee from April 12, 2024 and the grant of Options to Chankyu Park from May 10, 2024 and determined that such grants are not material and therefore do not require disclosure as a subsequent event under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855-10, second type. In response to the Staff’s comment, we revised the disclosure on page 102 of the Registration Statement in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to disclose the impacts of the cash bonus to Junkoo Kim approved by the Company’s board of directors on May 28, 2024 and that is payable in July 2024, provided that the closing of the offering has occurred prior to such date and subject to Mr. Kim’s continuous employment with us through such date. The fair value estimates used for restricted stock units and stock…
WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. · filed 2024-06-17 · 0001193125-24-162034
SEC staff comment
3. We note that you recorded Gain on bargain purchase in the amount of $185.7M. Please fully explain to us how you determined the fair value of the property, plant and equipment of Dril-Quip. Please specifically address why the gain on bargain purchase you recognized was so significant relative to the purchase price. Describe to us, in sufficient detail, the reassessment you performed pursuant to ASC 805-30-25-4 before recognizing the gain on bargain purchase. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission June 14, 2024 Page 3
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comments and has provided responses as follows: Fair value of the property, plant and equipment of Dril-Quip (the “PP&E”) To arrive at the fair value of the net assets acquired from Dril-Quip for the purpose of financial statement reporting, Innovex, the accounting acquirer, engaged an independent third-party valuation firm. The PP&E was measured at fair value in accordance with the definition in Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining the fair value of the PP&E, Innovex took into consideration the highest and best use from a market participant perspective. Innovex determined that the highest and best use of the PP&E was on a…
DRIL-QUIP INC · filed 2024-06-14 · 0001193125-24-161744
SEC staff comment
Comment: Your disclosures indicate that you performed a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis on two reporting units. Please identify for us the goodwill reporting unit beyond Animal Nutrition for which you performed the two-step quantitative assessment and quantify the amount of goodwill allocated to this reporting unit. Additionally, we note that you used both income and market approaches in determining the fair value of your reporting units. Tell us the relative weighting used for each approach and how you determined such weighting was appropriate. Further, tell us and revise future disclosures to explain how you performed the market approach, including significant estimates and assumptions used.
The company responded
In addition to the Animal Nutrition reporting unit, the Company performed the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment assessment for the Starches and Sweeteners reporting unit. The carrying value of goodwill allocated to the Starches and Sweeteners reporting unit was $219 million as of December 31, 2023. The Company used a combination of the income and market approaches when performing the quantitative assessment of goodwill for the Animal Nutrition reporting unit. The Company weighted the income approach with a probability weight of 75%, as it is based on the future business plans and growth estimates for the Company’s Animal Nutrition business and thus considers short-term and long-term cash flow expectations for the business. The market approach was weighted less heavily at 25%, as it represents an estimate of fair value based on market guideline companies for which future growth…
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co · filed 2024-06-12 · 0001193125-24-159925
SEC staff comment
3. Please clarify for us the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are categorized in their entirety (Level 1, 2, or 3) for the three gaming licenses within the Casinos & Resorts segment that resulted in impairment during 2023 and the indefinite lived trademark within the International Interactive segment that resulted in impairment in 2022. Please tell us how you complied with ASC 820-10-50- 2(b) or tell us how you determined the disclosure of the level is not necessary. To the extent such items were valued using level 3 inputs, please tell us how you determined it was unnecessary to disclose quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs for such items in accordance with ASC 820-10-50-2(bbb).
The company responded
The three gaming licenses within the Company’s Casinos & Resorts segment that resulted in impairment during 2023 and the indefinite lived trademark within the Company’s International Interactive segment that resulted in impairment in 2022 were each categorized as level 3 measurements as prescribed in ASC 820-10-50-2(b). The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that it will expand its disclosure in future filings to include quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of these assets in accordance with ASC 820-10-50-2-(bbb). Specifically, in the Goodwill and Intangible Assets footnote to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements beginning with the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, or for earlier interim periods as applicable, the Company will expand its disclosure to…
Bally's Corp · filed 2024-06-12 · 0001747079-24-000071
SEC staff comment
5. We note your disclosure of 344,182 options granted in 2023 with a weighted-average exercise price of 0.063 and a weighted-average grant-date fair value price of 10.80. Please explain to us how you determined the fair value of the common stock underlying your 2023 equity issuances, as well as your 2024 equity issuances and the reasons for the differences between those valuations of your common stock leading up to the estimated $18/share IPO offering price. In your response, please also address your considerations for the May 2024, options granted to employees to purchase 554,330 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 0.23 NIS per share as disclosed on page F-21 and F-78. Tell us the weighted-average grant-date fair value price of the May 2024 grant and disclose total unrecognized compensation cost related to that grant.
The company responded
The Company respectfully submits to the Staff the below additional information to assist in its review of the Company’s determination of the fair value of the ordinary shares underlying its outstanding equity awards granted in 2023 and its proposed 2024 issuance and the reasons for the discrepancies between the previous valuations of the Company’s ordinary shares leading up to the proposed initial public offering (the “ IPO ”) and the estimated offering price for the Company’s ordinary shares in the IPO. 2 The Company respectfully advises the Staff that it currently expects the offering price in the IPO to be $18 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of the Registration Statement. On May 28, 2024, the Company implemented a share split of all of its issued ordinary shares which resulted in a 4.390914-for-1 share split of the Company’s ordinary…
Gauzy Ltd. · filed 2024-06-05 · 0001213900-24-049882
SEC staff comment
2. We note you elected the fair value option for 72 investments in unconsolidated investment entities and it appears performance allocations or carried interest are allocated to the general partner, special limited partner or asset manager of your fair value option unconsolidated investments. Please explain to us in detail how your election of the fair value option for unconsolidated investment entities that have performance allocations or carried interest is appropriate. Please cite the relevant accounting guidance in your response.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and notes that as discussed in its response to Question 1 above, despite the large quantity of co-investment structures that make up a part of its unconsolidated investments, approximately 55% (as of the year ended December 31, 2023) of the Company’s accrued carried interests result from its investment in investment companies that are accounted for under Topic 323; the Company’s equity method earnings are computed based upon the fair value reporting of these investment companies under Topic 946, and accordingly no fair value option was elected by the Company. With respect to 72 co-investment structures where the Company elected the fair value option, the Company submits that the fair value election is permissible for an equity method investment under ASC Topic 825-10-15-4a, Financial Instruments - Overall . To the extent that the Staff’s…
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. · filed 2024-06-05 · 0001408100-24-000096
SEC staff comment
8. The Staff refers to page 88 of the 10-K. In future filings, as it relates to the debt obligations, disclose in which level of the fair value hierarchy those debt obligations would be classified.
The company responded
The Company confirms that it will comply with the Staff’s comment in future filings.
SCP Private Credit Income BDC LLC · filed 2024-06-04 · 0001193125-24-153814
SEC staff comment
11. The Staff refers to page 102 of the 10-K. In future filings, as it relates to the debt obligations, disclose in which level of the fair value hierarchy those debt obligations would be classified.
The company responded
The Company confirms that it will comply with the Staff’s comment in future filings. June 4, 2024 Page 4
SLR HC BDC LLC · filed 2024-06-04 · 0001193125-24-153805
SEC staff comment
Comment 3: Please supplementally expand on the valuation disclosure included in the Notes to the Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and the Fund’s prospectus dated April 28, 2023 to describe the process surrounding how the Fund’s fair valuation models evaluate periodic weightings attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. In your response, please incorporate details of the valuation techniques, inputs and weightings used to derive the fair value of the following loan investment held by the Fund as of December 31, 2023: TruGreen Limited Partnership (CUSIP: 89787RAK8). The staff is aware of observable price indicators in the marketplace that differ significantly from the Fund’s marks for this loan.
The company responded
U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which ranks the level of observability of market price inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment and state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. As noted in its annual report, the Fund indicates that in certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. The Adviser’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment…
Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund · filed 2024-05-31 · 0001193125-24-151240
SEC staff comment
12. We note your unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements include the pro forma impact of the pending acquisition of the East Stateline Ranch Assets. In your disclosures, it appears that you have included the entire amount of the fair value of the assets acquired of $360 million net of the historical equity value of $12.8 million as an adjustment to property plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation on the pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet. We further note that there does not appear to be any transaction adjustments that have been recorded related to such acquisition on your pro forma consolidated statement of operations. Please tell us how the Company applied the guidance in Rule 11-02(a)(6)(i) which requires the Company to depict the adjustments in the pro forma condensed balance sheet in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and have revised the disclosure on pages F-13 and F-14 of the Registration Statement accordingly. Rule 11-01(d) requires registrants to assess whether an acquiree meets the definition of a business, focusing primarily on whether the revenue-producing activity generally remains the same after the acquisition. Under Rule 11-01(d), we have determined that the acquiree meets the definition of a business for SEC purposes. Under ASC 805-10-55-5A, a reporting entity assesses whether an acquiree is a business first by applying the “screen test,” by determining whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. Under ASC 805, we have determined that the acquiree does not meet the definition of a business, as substantially all of the entity’s assets…
LandBridge Co LLC · filed 2024-05-31 · 0001193125-24-151971
SEC staff comment
1. We acknowledge your response to prior comment one. Please explain to us whether your decision to deprioritize further development of RENB-HV-01 and the resulting impairment of your IPR&D intangible asset was considered when determining the fair value of your reporting unit for purposes of your goodwill impairment analysis. Please also explain whether the March 2024 termination of the license agreement covering RENB-HV-01 triggered an impairment loss in the quarter ended March 31, 2024.
The company responded
The HIV related product pipeline was deprioritized due to management determining it would require less time and capital to pursue the Company’s oncology product pipeline when compared to its HIV pipeline. While we have deprioritized the development of our HIV pipeline, we have not discontinued its development. The effect of this decision was depicted in the timing of the future cash flows associated with the monetization and development of our remaining candidates in our evaluation. May 31, 2024 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY RENOVARO INC. Page 2 For the year ended June 30, 2023, the decision to deprioritize the further development of RENB-HV-01 was considered in determining the fair value of our reporting unit for purposes of our goodwill impairment analysis. In estimating the fair value of the reporting unit we pushed out the timing of the future cash flows expected to be derived…
RENOVARO INC. · filed 2024-05-31 · 0001731122-24-000902
SEC staff comment
2. Key assumptions in the cost-to-recreate method that was applied to the valuation of the RENB-HV-01 product candidate were: 2.1. Direct cost inputs (in thousands): 2.1.1. R&D [***] 2.1.2. R&D – Laboratory expenses [***] 2.1.3. R&D – Consulting [***] 2.1.4. R&D – Consumables & Reagents [***] 2.1.5. R&D – Experimental outsourced services [***] 2.2. Entrepreneurial incentive: 2.2.1. Replacement period – 48 months 2.2.2. Average Replacement Cost Over Term (in thousands) [***] 2.2.3. Required Return on Incentive (monthly) [***] 2.2.4. Required Return Adj. for Replacement Period [***] 2.2.5. Concluded Entrepreneurial Incentive (in thousands) [***] 2.3. Replacement period – 48 months We believe that the WACC is the only input that is reasonably likely to change within our estimate. The remaining inputs remain our best estimates for these valuations, and we don’t believe that they are…
The company responded
Our decision to deprioritize further development of RENB-HV-01 resulted in the model used to value this potential product changing from a discounted cash flow analysis to a cost-to-recreate approach beginning in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Therefore, all of the assumptions noted above reflect this initial deprioritization. ● Explain whether the March 2024 termination of the license agreement covering RENB-HV-01 triggered an impairment loss in the quarter ended March 31, 2024.
RENOVARO INC. · filed 2024-05-31 · 0001731122-24-000902
SEC staff comment
3. We note that you provided pro forma financial statements related to the GEDi Cube acquisition in your Proxy Statement submitted on January 3, 2024. Your pro forma presentation treats this acquisition as a business combination. Please tell us how you considered the guidance in ASC 805-10-55-5A in determining that GEDi Cube constitutes a business given that substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired appear to be concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. In this regard, your pro forma financial statements show that indefinite life intangible assets of $275.2 million comprise the entirety of the purchase consideration transferred.
The company responded
Please see Appendix A which includes the relevant guidance prepared by the Company concerning the acquisition of GEDi Cube and our conclusion that the acquisition met the requirements to be treated as a business combination after considering the guidance in ASC 805-10-55-5A.
RENOVARO INC. · filed 2024-05-31 · 0001731122-24-000902
SEC staff comment
36. Response 9 refers the staff to page 12 of the Revised Methodology to explain compliance with the requirements under rule 2a-5(b)(2). The individuals identified in the Revised Valuation Methodology are identified as financial analysts that work at ABL Technologies. If accurate, please confirm whether the personnel responsible for determining the fair value of designated investments under rule 2a-5(b)(2) will not be employed by the Manager, and that further, the individuals responsible for fair valuation at ABL Technologies do not have an accounting background. We confirm that the ultimate decision on fair valuation of the Longevity Assets held by the Fund will be made by the Manager on behalf of the Fund, with oversight of the Board. The individuals noted in the Valuation Methodology provide the initial support for making this determination, which the Valuation Designee of the…
The company responded
indicates that Management and the Board will periodically review the reasonableness of the methodology. Please define what the cadence is here specifically (i.e., monthly? quarterly? annually? etc.) and clarify how it complies with rule 2a-5. The Board will review the valuation risk and other risks confronting the Fund at its quarterly board meetings or more often if deemed appropriate, and take additional action as it deems to be in the best interest of the Fund and shareholders. Currently, the Board has determined that the annual review in the fourth quarter, together with its quarterly review of Management reporting will adequately address the effectiveness of the Valuation Designee’s processes. We note that in Release No. IC-34128 the SEC indicated that the Board would have latitude to determine the frequency of reviews for the particular Fund. 19 May 24, 2024 Page 20
ABL Longevity Growth & Income Fund · filed 2024-05-24 · 0001193125-24-146941
SEC staff comment
9. The revisions made in response to comment 17 indicate that you performed a quantitative assessment of goodwill as of December 31, 2023 for your NetWolves reporting unit. Please expand your disclosures to address the following: ● Provide a detailed description of the method(s) used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit: ● Disclose the quantified assumptions used in determining the fair value of the reporting unit and how such assumptions were determined; and ● Explain how changes in key assumptions could impact your fair value determination.
The company responded
We note the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that our disclosure has been revised in accordance with Comment 9 hereof. 3
Achari Ventures Holdings Corp. I · filed 2024-05-24 · 0001213900-24-046764
SEC staff comment
10. Your revised disclosures indicates that you obtained a fair value opinion from an outside valuation firm. Please tell us the nature and extent of the specialist’s involvement and whether you believe the specialist was acting as an expert as defined under Section11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section Section 436(b) of Regulation C, such that you must disclose the name of the specialist in the Form S-4 and provide a consent from the specialist. If you conclude the specialist is not considered an expert under the Securities Act, please revise your disclosures to clarify.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company notes that the outside valuation firm that provided the fair value opinion, prepared such report in the quantitative assessment of goodwill as of December 31, 2023, for one of Vaso’s reporting units. The assessment was conducted in connection with the preparation of Vaso’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2023. We respectfully submit that the third-party provider of the opinion is not “expert” under Rule 436. Rule 436 requires that a consent be filed if any portion of a report or opinion of an expert is quoted or summarized as such in a registration statement. Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that an expert is “any accountant, engineer, or appraiser, or any person whose profession gives authority to a statement made by him.” The Company respectfully submits that the third party provider is not among the class…
Achari Ventures Holdings Corp. I · filed 2024-05-24 · 0001213900-24-046764
SEC staff comment
11. As a related matter, we see that you performed a qualitative analysis of the FGE reporting unit and “concluded a goodwill impairment charge was not warranted.” Revise to disclose, if true, that it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is not less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, as stated in ASC 350-20-35-3.
The company responded
We note the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that our disclosure has been revised in accordance with Comment 11 hereof. 4 General
Achari Ventures Holdings Corp. I · filed 2024-05-24 · 0001213900-24-046764
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you performed a goodwill impairment test before and after the change in the composition of your reporting units and that no impairment existed and none was identified during the three months ended March 31, 2024. Please tell us if you performed impairment testing at March 31, 2024. Given the deterioration in your operating results (i.e., decreases in net sales, operating income and cash flows from operations) and the outlook for the remainder of 2024, tell us and disclose in future filings the percentage by which your estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value for each reporting unit and the specific key assumptions used in the fair value determination as of the date of your most recent impairment test. Please refer to Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2023, and an interim impairment test on our Enterprise (previously Building and Data Center Connectivity), Access Network Solutions (ANS), and Broadband (previously Network Cable and Connectivity) reporting units as of January 1, 2024, immediately before and after changes in the composition of those reporting units. As of March 31, 2024, management considered whether it was more likely than not the carrying amount of a reporting unit that includes goodwill exceeded its fair value and concluded based on our evaluation that it was not. Our first quarter results were consistent or better than projections used in the prior annual test and the discount rates used in the discounted cash flow (DCF) model declined. As such, no further impairment testing was performed as of March 31, 2024. The Company informs the Staff below and…
CommScope Holding Company, Inc. · filed 2024-05-23 · 0000950170-24-063898
SEC staff comment
Comment 21 . In “principal risks of investing in the funds”, in liquidity risk and valuation risk, we note that the principal strategy of the Fund is to invest in mid-cap securities, which are typically liquid and have readily available market values. If the Funds invest in illiquid securities or securities that need to be fair valued as principal strategy, the principal strategy should this or remove the risks.
The company responded
The Registrant confirms that the Funds do not invest in illiquid securities or securities that need to be fair valued as a principal strategy. The Registrant has revised the disclosure to remove liquidity risk and valuation risk from the principal risks disclosure as requested.
CANTOR SELECT PORTFOLIOS TRUST · filed 2024-05-22 · 0001580642-24-002781
SEC staff comment
5. We note that in connection with the sale of a 50% interest in SGV to Essilor in March 2022 for $52.1 million, the creation of a new joint venture in which each party contributed their interest in SGV along with a $10 million cash payment, you remeasured the fair value of your retained equity investment in the new joint venture at $90 million resulting in the recognition of a $56.9 million gain. Please tell us the facts and circumstances and your consideration of the guidance in ASC 820 that lead you to concluded that your 50% 5 ownership interest had a fair value of $90 million considering Essilor had just acquired the other 50% for $52.1 million.
The company responded
CooperVision Inc. and Essilor International SAS (Essilor) entered into a joint venture agreement in February 2021 and executed a Contribution Agreement and a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Agreements") in March 2022. Essilor paid CooperVision $52.1 million in exchange for a 50% interest in SightGlass Vision, Inc. (SGV) and its proportionate share of the revenue payments. The $52.1 million payment was calculated based on the enterprise value of SGV as of the most recent valuation date at the time, January 19, 2021. Taking into account the guidance in ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement and with the assistance of independent third-party valuation specialists, we estimated the value of the intangible assets in connection with the acquisition of SGV as of January 19, 2021 and then the value of our interest in the equity of SGV Holdings, Inc. as of March 14, 2022. The increase in the value of the…
COOPER COMPANIES, INC. · filed 2024-05-22 · 0000711404-24-000029
SEC staff comment
8. We note your characterization of certain adjustments as unusual, including certain litigation expense, gain or loss on deconsolidation of subsidiaries, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and product transition costs. Please revise your description of these types of adjustment to comply with the guidance in Question 102.03 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We confirm we will revise in future earnings release filings, beginning with our earnings release for the second quarter of fiscal 2024, which we expect to submit on May 30, 2024, the description "other exceptional or unusual" consistent with the guidance in Question 102.03 of the Staff’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Questions 9 - 12: Overall response: With respect to the Staff’s questions 9 through 12, we reviewed and considered non-GAAP reconciliation disclosures from a large number of publicly traded med-tech and medical device companies. Beginning with our earnings release for the second quarter of fiscal 2024, which we expect to submit on May 30, 2024, we will incorporate new disclosures that both align with common approaches to non-GAAP reconciliations and address the Staff’s comments in this letter. Please see attached Exhibit A for an…
COOPER COMPANIES, INC. · filed 2024-05-22 · 0000711404-24-000029
SEC staff comment
2. FL carries a licence issued by the Nevada State Athletic Commission to allow the company in the state of Nevada to produce live Kickboxing, Boxing, and mixed martial arts (“MMA”) shows, notably in Las Vegas. FL should be considered as an asset acquisition as it’s noted that the Nevada licence represents the key material asset of the acquisition. 805-10-55-4 A business consists of inputs and processes applied to those inputs that have the ability to contribute to the creation of outputs. Although businesses usually have outputs, outputs are not required for an integrated set to qualify as a business. The three elements of a business are defined as follows: a. Input. Any economic resource that creates, or has the ability to contribute to the creation of, outputs when one or more processes are applied to it. b. Process. Any system, standard, protocol, convention, or rule that when…
The company responded
We have amended the 10Q accordingly per the above response. Sincerely, Andrei Stoukan United Express Inc. May 22, 2024
United Express Inc. · filed 2024-05-22 · 0001607062-24-000206
SEC staff comment
4. We note that beginning in fiscal 2024 you changed the valuation model used to determine the fair value of stock options from a lattice-based option pricing model to the Black- Scholes option pricing model. Please tell us and disclose pursuant to SAB Topic 14:C.3 the basis for the change. Consistent with ASC 718-10-55-20 and 55-27, tell us how you concluded, if true, that the Black-Scholes model results in a better estimate of fair value.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and the applicable guidance cited. As disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2023, we recorded $12.4 million, $17.9 million, and $20.0 million for stock option expense for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, with the decrease in expense between these years due to fewer employees receiving stock option grants. In fiscal year 2022, we began to grant stock option awards to a smaller group of employees than in prior years, as a larger proportion of our employees began receiving time-based restricted stock unit awards in lieu of stock options. We do not expect the amount of stock option expense in future filings to rise above the immaterial levels we are now recording. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Page 4 May 21, 2024 During 2022, we also began reassessing the valuation techniques needed to appropriately determine the fair…
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC · filed 2024-05-21 · 0001094285-24-000081
SEC staff comment
1. We note your disclosures regarding the quantitative goodwill impairment tests performed in 2022 and 2023. Please tell us the percentage by which the fair value of each of your reporting units exceeded their carrying value as of your most recent impairment test. To the extent any of the reporting unit's fair value was not substantially in excess of its carrying value, disclose the percentage by which the fair value exceeded the carrying value. Alternatively, revise to state if true, that the estimated fair value substantially exceeded the carrying value for each of the reporting units. Refer to our comment and your response to prior comment 13 in your letter dated March 29, 2019.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and informs the Staff that as of October 1, 2023, the estimated fair value of the A&G reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 37%, which we consider substantial with reference to the 15% threshold we identified as substantial excess in our prior comment letter response dated March 29, 2019. As noted in the filing, the IP reporting unit's goodwill balance is fully impaired. Also as noted in the filing, the LS&H reporting unit's goodwill balance was partially impaired as of October 1, 2023, the date of our most recent quantitative goodwill impairment test. We wrote down the carrying value to equal estimated fair value as of such date and provided a sensitivity disclosure since there was no remaining excess fair value for the LS&H reporting unit. In future filings, the Company will provide a statement that the fair value of…
CLARIVATE PLC · filed 2024-05-20 · 0001764046-24-000085
SEC staff comment
3. We note that you partially attribute the increases in your allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory valuation reserves to "addition from acquisitions." Tell us how your accounting treatment complies with ASC 805-20-30-4, which indicates that acquirers shall not recognize a separate valuation allowance as of the acquisition date for assets acquired in a business combination that are measured at their acquisition-date fair values because the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows are included in the fair value measure. In doing so, tell us how you determined the acquisition-date fair values of accounts receivable and inventory acquired in business combinations. Company
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and, in response to the Staff's comment, the Company notes that acquired Accounts Receivables and Inventory are recorded at fair value in its consolidated balance sheet in accordance with ASC 805. For acquired Accounts Receivable, the Company estimated their fair value by identifying the historical cost and evaluating their collectability. This evaluation was based on factors such as prior experience, an appraisal of the customers’ ability to pay, the age of the outstanding receivables, and the economic conditions within and outside the aviation, defense, space, medical, telecommunications, and electronics industries. For acquired Inventory, the Company estimated its fair value by assessing the market value or replacement cost and adjusting for factors such as physical condition, sales patterns, and expected future demand. This…
HEICO CORP · filed 2024-05-20 · 0000046619-24-000033
SEC staff comment
Comment: In the fourth paragraph under “How to Buy and Sell Shares,” please describe how fair value pricing is administered and by which service provider.
The company responded
The disclosure has been revised consistent with the Staff’s comment. Statement of Additional Information 21.
ETF Opportunities Trust · filed 2024-05-17 · 0001999371-24-006259
SEC staff comment
Comment : In the last paragraph on the first page of the Cover, the disclosure states “Simultaneous with the commencement of the Fund’s operations”, the Predecessor Fund “is expected to reorganize into the Fund.” Regarding the Reorganization: a. Please disclose how the Predecessor Fund’s shares will be valued for purposes of the Reorganization. Will there be any dilution for shareholders who purchase shares in the initial offering (and who are not holders of shares of the Predecessor Fund)? If so, please provide appropriate disclosure on the Cover and in the Prospectus. b. Please explain to us in correspondence what information investors will have available to them about the Predecessor Fund and its portfolio prior to purchasing shares of the Fund. c. Please tell us when the Predecessor Fund was formed and how long it has been operating. If the Predecessor Fund was recently formed,…
The company responded
The Fund no longer intends to conduct a Reorganization with the Predecessor Fund and has removed the related disclosure from the Registration Statement. 9. Staff
Franklin Lexington Private Markets Fund · filed 2024-05-17 · 0001193125-24-141851
SEC staff comment
Comment : On page 79, please disclose the Manager’s conflict of receiving an asset-based fee while determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments (the disclosure on page 90 in Net Asset Valuation states “The Board has designated the Manager to perform [the Fund’s] fair value determinations...” in accordance with its procedures and Rule 2a-5). If the Manager will have a role in determining the Fund’s use of leverage, please also disclose here, or where appropriate, the Manager’s conflict in this role while receiving an asset-based Management Fee.
The company responded
The Fund confirms that it has made the requested disclosure. The Fund notes though that its management fee is based on the Fund’s net assets and does not take into account the use of leverage. 11 Repurchase of Shares (page 101) 41. Staff
Franklin Lexington Private Markets Fund · filed 2024-05-17 · 0001193125-24-141851
SEC staff comment
9. We note that you have recorded a $48 million liability pursuant to ASC 460 related to a Brazilian tax matter. Please clarify how you determined this matter was within the guarantee scope of ASC 460-10-15-4 as opposed to other guidance, such as the unrecognized tax benefit guidance of ASC 740. Citing authoritative guidance, where applicable, clarify where you recorded the debit when you originally recorded the liability and whether the original and subsequent entries related to this liability qualify for continuing or discontinued operations classification. In addition, considering the assessments currently total approximately $393 million and the terms of your tax matters agreement, tell us how you determined the fair value of the liability was only $48 million.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and is providing the following commentary to explain our approach for determining the Brazilian tax matter was within the guarantee scope of ASC 460-10-15-4. Additionally, our commentary provides the requested clarifications and explains our determination of the fair value of the liability. Sylvamo do Brasil Ltda. (“Sylvamo Brazil”) was challenged by the tax authorities in Brazil on the deductibility of goodwill amortization related to a 2007 acquisition. At the time the assessments were received, Sylvamo Brazil was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company divested Sylvamo Brazil on October 1, 2021, as part of the spin-off of our printing papers business. Sylvamo Brazil is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sylvamo Corporation (“Sylvamo”), the entity formed in connection with the spin-off. Prior to the spin-off, the…
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/ · filed 2024-05-17 · 0001193125-24-141765
SEC staff comment
1. We note that one of your centers has an estimated fair value less than its recorded carrying value of approximately $ 111.1 million and that you are monitoring for circumstances and events in future periods that could affect inputs such as the expected holding period, operating cash flow forecasts and capitalization rates utilized to determine whether an impairment charge is necessary. Please tell us, and consider disclosing in future filings: • the identity of the center in question • how you applied the guidance in ASC 360-10-35-29 to 35 and the Interpretative Response to Question 3 of ASC 360-10-S99-2 in your impairment analysis • how you determined that the carrying value of the center is recoverable, and • how you considered the disclosure guidance in Item 303(b)(3) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comments regarding the evaluation of Impairment of long-lived assets. the identity of the center in question • The center in question is our Atlantic City, New Jersey property (the “Center”), which we acquired in 2011 and as of December 31, 2023 had a carrying value of $111.1 million. We determined that the carrying value of the Center is recoverable because the undiscounted cash flows as calculated in accordance with ASC 360 were in excess of the carrying value of $111.1 million by $39.6 million or 36%. The disclosure of this property and the results of our impairment evaluation first appeared in our 2020 Form 10-K, filed on February 23, 2021. With the onset of the COVID pandemic, the occupancy rate fell below 80%, significantly lower than our overall portfolio average. However, as shown in the table below, the center’s occupancy percentage has recovered to…
TANGER PROPERTIES LTD PARTNERSHIP /NC/ · filed 2024-05-17 · 0000899715-24-000104
SEC staff comment
Comment: We note that you used the cost approach to estimate the fair value of the developed technology and IPR&D. Please provide us with a comprehensive explanation as to how you concluded the cost approach is the most reasonable method for estimating fair value and the specific references to the guidance supporting your conclusion. In addition, tell us why the goodwill estimated to be recognized significantly exceeds the fair value of the developed technology and IPR&D considering the nature of the activities of Adagio, which appears to be research and development focused.
The company responded
The Registrant respectively acknowledges the Staff’s comments regarding the approach to fair value. In order to measure the fair value of the developed technology and IPR&D, consideration was given to the income, market, and cost approaches. In the assessment of the most reasonable valuation method, key considerations included the following: • Income approach could not be reasonably supported due to the limited availability of long-term prospective financial information (PFI) for the business. As Adagio’s forecast was only available for FY24 and FY25, there are challenges associated with subjectivity of forecast extension beyond FY25 (e.g., developmental stage company; unique products with significant uncertainty in outcomes beyond FY25; market penetration; etc.). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finance Office of Industrial Applications and Services May 13,…
Aja Holdco, Inc. · filed 2024-05-13 · 0001140361-24-025755
SEC staff comment
Comment: Other than for the intangible assets, it appears that you have prepared the allocation of the consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on Adagio’s historical carrying values rather than the estimated fair values in accordance with ASC 805-20-30. Please revise the purchase price allocation to include estimates of fair value. Also provide a description of the assumptions used to estimate material assets and liabilities at fair value. Refer to ASC 805-20-50-1 for the required disclosures.
The company responded
The Registrant respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that the Registrant had considered ASC 805-20-30 and based on currently available information used in the preliminary assessment, the estimated fair values of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed other than for the intangible assets and warrant liabilities, is not materially different from the carrying values. The Registrant had updated the disclosure in Note 4 to include the assumptions used in the valuation of warrant liabilities. The Registrant respectfully advises the Staff that Adagio has engaged third-party specialists to assist it in completing the valuation of certain assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed. As this final valuation analysis is undergoing and not yet completed, the Registrant believes the amounts in the pro forma financial statements to be reasonable and…
Aja Holdco, Inc. · filed 2024-05-13 · 0001140361-24-025755
SEC staff comment
6. We note your response to prior comment 18. Please revise your disclosures to include a critical accounting policy to discuss the estimates and assumptions associated with goodwill. Tell us whether any of your reporting units are at risk of failing a quantitative analysis and if so, revise your critical accounting policies to disclose: a. The percentage by which fair value exceeded carrying value as of the date of the most recent test; b. The amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit: c. A discussion of the degree of uncertainty, which includes specifics to the extent possible, associated with key assumptions used your analysis; and d. A description of potential events and/or changes in circumstance that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the key assumptions. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance May 13, 2024 Page 3 If you have…
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company respectfully advises Staff we revised our disclosure on pages 148 and F-41 of the document. Cycurion reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The review of impairment consists of either using a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the assets is less than their respective carrying values or a one-step qualitative impairment test. In performing the qualitative assessment, Cycurion considers many factors in evaluating whether the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable, including an analysis of its contract backlog and sales pipeline. While the contract backlog is confirmed as contractual wins, the sales pipeline is evaluated by management to…
Western Acquisition Ventures Corp. · filed 2024-05-13 · 0001104659-24-060687
SEC staff comment
20. We note your disclosure on page 71 and elsewhere that the holders of NEH Common Stock have the contingent right to receive up to an aggregate of 1.0 million additional shares of ROCL’s common stock (the “Earnout Shares”). Tell us and disclose how you accounted for the earnout shares and methodology used in computing the fair value of the contingent consideration.
The company responded
The Earnout Share provision will be classified within equity under ASC 815. As a result of equity classification, the fair value of the shares transferred will be recorded within equity upon the date the shares are granted to the holder (i.e., the date in which the occurrence of Triggering Events I and/or II are met, if they are met. Therefore, no accounting impact is deemed to exist as of the date of the pro forma financial statements. The fair value of the shares transferred will be recorded within the financial statements of the combined company as of the date on which the occurrence of Triggering Event 1 and/or II are met if they are met. Responsive disclosure has been added to page 87 of Amendment No. 1.
Roth CH Acquisition V Co. · filed 2024-05-10 · 0001104659-24-060101
SEC staff comment
25. We note that pro forma adjustment H appears to assume a fair value of $9.00 per share for the issuance of the 575,000 shares of ROCL common stock to advisors for services rendered in connection with the business combination. Please revise to clarify how the fair value for this share issuance was determined. In this regard, we note the price of ROCL stock appears to be quoted at a significantly higher price than $9.00 as disclosed on page 171.
The company responded
The fair value of the common stock issued to advisors for services rendered was based on the fee in the business combination marketing agreement of 4.5% of the gross proceeds of the ROCL IPO of $5,175,000 that the advisors were initially entitled to upon consummation of the Business Combination. Responsive disclosure has been added to page 88 of Amendment No. 1.
Roth CH Acquisition V Co. · filed 2024-05-10 · 0001104659-24-060101
SEC staff comment
6. Please address the following comments related to your non-GAAP measures: • We note your non-GAAP adjustments for “Excess manufacturing overhead and factory transition costs" and "Litigation costs." Tell us the specific nature of the items included within these line items. Explain how you concluded that they are not normal, recurring, cash operating expenses of your business and why eliminating them within your non-GAAP financial measures is meaningful and appropriate. In doing so, ensure you explain in sufficient detail how you determine the costs that should and should not be included within "Excess manufacturing overhead and factory transition costs" and why you consider the legal costs to be "non-recurring." Specifically provide us with the frequency and amounts of litigation cost non-GAAP adjustments made in prior periods. Refer to Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial…
The company responded
The excess manufacturing overhead costs included in our non-GAAP financial measures are the result of converting a refurbishment plant in Mexico into a full-fledged manufacturing facility. This transition was in response to tariffs enacted on imports from China destined for North America. Our manufacturing overhead costs were also negatively impacted because we temporarily expanded our global footprint by opening a factory in Vietnam as part of our long-term factory planning strategy. This was done to lower our manufacturing concentration risk in China. We determined excess overhead as amounts exceeding normal and historical levels of manufacturing inefficiencies. The excess manufacturing overhead costs included in our non-GAAP financial measures are not necessary to operate our business and, therefore, distort the Company’s operating performance. These costs are temporal and are…
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC · filed 2024-05-10 · 0000101984-24-000073
SEC staff comment
3. We note your substantial Goodwill balance as of year end, including the balances reflected in your Commercial Airplanes and Defense, Space & Security segments. We further note these segments have sustained significant operating losses in either all, or two of the three most recent years presented in your filing. In future filings beginning with your next quarterly report, please revise the notes to the financial statements and your Critical Accounting Estimates section in MD&A to disclose whether a qualitative or quantitative impairment test was performed for the respective reporting units. For any reporting unit requiring a quantitative impairment test, disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to test for impairment. Your disclosure should also state whether or not the fair value of your reporting units “substantially exceeds” the carrying value. To the extent any…
The company responded
We perform our annual goodwill impairment test as of April 1 each year. On April 1, 2023, we performed a qualitative test. The qualitative test was partly informed by quantitative valuations of each of our reporting units performed as of January 1, 2023, in connection with a reorganization of our Defense, Space & Security (“BDS”) reporting units. As of both dates, we determined the fair value of each of our reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. Our January 1, 2023, quantitative valuations estimated the fair value of each of our reporting units using discounted cash flows and market-based valuation methodologies (such as comparable public company trading values, where appropriate). Significant assumptions used in the valuations included our forecasts of future cash flows, discount rates derived from our market capitalization, and an estimated control…
BOEING CO · filed 2024-05-09 · 0000012927-24-000030
SEC staff comment
10. The Staff refers to the foregoing disclosure on page 74 of the Form 10-K: “As of December 31, 2023, the carrying value of secured borrowings totaled $15.9 million and the fair value of the associated loans included in investments was $15.8 million.” Please reconcile the foregoing disclosure with footnotes (o), (aa), and (an) to the Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2023.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff on a supplemental basis that, with respect to each of American Allwaste (footnote (o)), 2KDirect (footnote (aa)), and ISI PSG Holdings, LLC (dba Incentive Solutions, Inc.) (footnote (an)), the $0.3 million, $4.0 million, and $13.5 million referenced in each footnote, respectively, refers to the original amount that was sold and recorded as a secured borrowing. As of December 31, 2023, the secured borrowing had (in thousands): (a) principal or par value of $330 and a fair value of $304 with respect to American Allwaste; (b) principal or par value of $3,328 and a fair value of $3,328 with respect to 2KDirect; and (c) principal or par value of $12,222 and a fair value of $12,168 with respect to ISI PSG Holdings, LLC. Subsequent to each original closing, there have been amortization payments paid against the secured borrowing reducing the original…
FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp · filed 2024-05-08 · 0001193125-24-133967
SEC staff comment
11. The Staff refers to the foregoing disclosure in the second paragraph under “Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies” on page 101 of the Form 10-K: “During fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, the Company elected to change the manner in which it presents residual investments in portfolio companies that have sold their operations and are in the process of winding down. These investments similar to escrow receivables are now included in prepaid expenses and other assets whereas previously they were included as a component of investments, at fair value, on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities until the security was legally extinguished or relinquished.” Please advise how the foregoing presentation complies with the requirements under footnote 1 to the Rule 12-12 of Regulation S-X, which requires each issue to be listed separately. Please advise if these residual…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has disclosed each residual investment in the Company’s portfolio companies in the Consolidated Schedule of Investments in the Form 10-Q.
FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp · filed 2024-05-08 · 0001193125-24-133967
SEC staff comment
12. Please confirm that escrow receivables and residual investments are fair valued.
The company responded
The Company respectfully advises the Staff on a supplemental basis that escrow receivables refers to investments that were previously exited and the Company no longer holds the security of the portfolio company and therefore are not fair valued. The carrying amount of the escrow receivables, however, approximate fair value. On the other hand, residual investments refer to portfolio investments in which the portfolio company has sold its operations and are in the process of winding down, but the Company continues to hold a security in the portfolio company and therefore are fair valued.
FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp · filed 2024-05-08 · 0001193125-24-133967
SEC staff comment
3. Address the following: • Separately provide us with the number of bitcoin assumed transferred on January 1, 2023 and the number of bitcoin used to fund the Sponsor’s Fee along with the relevant unit fair values and dollar amounts. • Tell us your consideration for separately presenting Transaction Accounting Adjustments under Rule 11-02(a)(6)(i) of Regulation S-X and Management’s Adjustments under Rule 11-02(a)(7) of Regulation S-X. • Tell us how your presentation clearly explains the assumptions underlying the calculations for the transaction accounting adjustments. Refer to Rule 11-02(a)(8) of Regulation S-X.
The company responded
The Sponsor has addressed each of the Staff’s comments as follows: • Revise the third paragraph of your introduction and the first paragraph of Note 1 to the unaudited pro forma financial statements to reflect the current requirements of Rule 11-02 of Regulation S-X. In this regard, pro forma financial statements are no longer limited to adjustments that are directly attributable to the transaction for which pro forma effect is being given, being factually supportable and, with respect to a statement of comprehensive income, expected to have a continuing impact; and The Sponsor has revised the disclosure on pages 60 and 64 of the Registration Statement in response to the Staff’s comment. • We are unable to recompute all the amounts presented in your pro forma financial statements based on the description of all pro forma adjustments in Note 3. Address the following: • Separately provide…
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust (BTC) · filed 2024-05-08 · 0001193125-24-134385
SEC staff comment
3. We note the value of your goodwill significantly exceeds your market capitalization. Please provide us with a reconciliation of the aggregate fair value of your reporting units to your market capitalization as of or around the goodwill impairment test date. Refer to ASC 350-20-35-22 to 35-24. In future filings if goodwill continues to exceed your market capitalization, provide a discussion of how you considered market capitalization when performing your goodwill impairment analysis.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. We note that ASC 350-20-35-4 indicates “The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill.” The market capitalization of the Company is an indication of the fair value of the common equity of the total Company which includes all reporting units. Accordingly, the Company’s market capitalization compared to the total carrying value of equity exceeded its carrying value as of the annual impairment test date and as of year-end. Additionally, we note that the goodwill balance primarily consists of $2,016 million attributable to our Local Media reporting unit and $61 million attributable to our Tennis reporting unit. These reporting units represent approximately 98% of consolidated revenue. The most recent quantitative…
Sinclair, Inc. · filed 2024-05-08 · 0001971213-24-000032
SEC staff comment
Comment 2. We have read your response to prior comment 2 and note the disclosures you propose to include in future filings. We also note the continued significant decline in your market capitalization during your current fiscal year. Please address the following: • Disclose whether you performed impairment tests since your most recent annual impairment tests and explain why or why not in your next quarterly filing. • Disclose the percentages by which the estimated fair values of your reporting units exceeded their carryings value as of your most recent impairment tests in your next quarterly filing. • Explain how you consider the difference between your net book value and market capitalization in assessing the reasonableness of the estimated fair values of your reporting units, including how you assess the reasonableness of any implied premium, in your next quarterly filing. • We note…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. In our forthcoming Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2024, the Company plans to enhance the disclosure contained in the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section of its Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in response to the Staff’s comment. In particular, the Company will disclose that it has performed interim impairment tests since our most recent annual impairment tests, which resulted in the impairment of machinery and equipment, intangibles and long-lived assets, indefinite-lived trademarks and amortizable customer relationships, primarily related to both the ParmCrisps ® and Thinsters ® brands and certain North America personal care brands (namely, Alba Botanica ® , Avalon Organics ® , and JASON ® ). The Company will also disclose…
HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC · filed 2024-05-07 · 0000910406-24-000032
SEC staff comment
Comment 3. Based on your response to prior comment 3 regarding the intangible asset impairments you recorded during the third quarter of fiscal 2023, we note you identified negative events that occurred prior to the impairments, including the loss of a significant customer during the first quarter of fiscal 2023. However, it is not clear if your prior Exchange Act filings provided any forewarning disclosures related to potential impairments. Please identify any forewarning disclosures you included in prior Exchange Act filings, or explain to us why no forewarning disclosures were required. Given the continued materiality of your intangible assets, if it is reasonably possible that additional impairments may materially impact your financial statements, please revise future filings to (i) disclose and discuss material negative events that occur; (ii) quantify and identify brands at risk;…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. In response, below please find a more detailed chronology of events and related disclosures that occurred in fiscal 2023 leading up to the asset impairment charges related to the ParmCrisps ® and Thinsters ® trademarks taken in the third quarter of fiscal 2023. First Quarter of Fiscal 2023 – Three Months ended September 30, 2022 At the time of the filing of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2023 (“Q1 2023 Form 10-Q”) on November 8, 2022, the loss of a major customer in the warehouse club channel, which represented the largest customer for the ParmCrisps ® products, was a recent development. In response to the loss, the Company put into place a comprehensive, strategic plan to win back the customer, gain distribution for ParmCrisps ® products with other customers, accelerate innovation and implement other…
HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC · filed 2024-05-07 · 0000910406-24-000032
SEC staff comment
2. In response to prior comment 16 you set forth the new issuance of shares is accounted for as part of the recapitalization since it would be carved out of the previously forfeited Class B Sponsor shares. It appears that the fair value of the shares to be issued from forfeited shares should be recorded as a pro forma expense since the shares are being issued by Global Partner Acquisition Corp II and the issuance relates to the Non- Redemption Agreements. Please explain to us in further detail the basis for your accounting, or provide a pro forma adjustment to account for the issuance of the shares as an expense related to the Non-Redemption Agreements.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully submits that we have added discussion in adjustments P and EE to reflect the impact of the purchase. Please see revised disclosure on pages 227, 228 and 231 of the Revised Registration Statement. Business of Stardust Power Financing Incentives, page 279
Global Partner Acquisition Corp II · filed 2024-05-06 · 0001193125-24-132270